From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Jean Louis Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41097: 28.0.50; (dired-toggle-marks) not working after copy Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 17:55:03 +0300 Message-ID: <20200510145503.GE28606@protected.rcdrun.com> References: <861rnybf34.fsf@protected.rcdrun.com> <20200506144423.GW24998@protected.rcdrun.com> <20200508132924.GI14650@protected.rcdrun.com> <87r1vukl86.fsf@web.de> <20200509042353.GA15309@protected.rcdrun.com> <87h7wonnuh.fsf@fliptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20200510095646.GA22962@protected.rcdrun.com> <83y2pzdgt7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="95786"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.0 (2020-05-02) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, tomasn@posteo.net, 41097@debbugs.gnu.org, arthur.miller@live.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 10 17:49:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jXoCV-000OkS-R4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 17:49:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43604 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXoCU-0008Kv-2y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 11:49:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55980) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXoBO-0007rN-Ac for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 11:48:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38717) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXoBO-0001j7-1F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 11:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXoBN-0003qw-Vo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 11:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jean Louis Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 15:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41097 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41097-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41097.158912562514670 (code B ref 41097); Sun, 10 May 2020 15:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41097) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2020 15:47:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50257 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXoAS-0003oW-Ll for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 11:47:05 -0400 Original-Received: from stw1.rcdrun.com ([217.170.207.13]:50649) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXnMt-000258-8S for 41097@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 10:55:52 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([::ffff:41.210.154.28]) (AUTH: PLAIN securesender, TLS: TLS1.2,256bits,ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by stw1.rcdrun.com with ESMTPSA id 000000000006FD13.000000005EB815D4.00002CC5; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:55:13 -0700 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83y2pzdgt7.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 10 May 2020 11:47:03 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180011 Archived-At: * Eli Zaretskii [2020-05-10 17:08]: > > Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 12:56:46 +0300 > > From: Jean Louis > > Cc: Michael Heerdegen , 41097@debbugs.gnu.org, > > rthur Miller > > > > So C flag is mark same as with t, that is good for me. > > > > But that behavior is not described that I know. If that is intended to > > be so, that marking and flagging is the same, then maybe description > > should be changed for that function, that user knows that function > > will not work if files have the flag C for being copied. > > > > Toggle marks: marked files become unmarked, and vice versa. > > Files marked with other flags (such as ‘D’) are not affected. > > ‘.’ and ‘..’ are never toggled. > > As always, hidden subdirs are not affected. > > Could you please tell what is missing or confusing in the doc string? > Is it the fact that it mentions 'D', but not 'C'? There is menu "Mark", in the menu there is "m" for mark, and "d" for flag. If m is for marking then (dired-toggle-marks) should work with success, because why it should not work if the file is flagged with C, because it is not a file for deletion. If is is for marking and d for flaging means to prepare for deletion, then "m" does not flag, it marks, so there are no "other flags" but there is just one mark and other flags. If menu separates marks from flags, then the function should separate marks from flags too, maybe except for flagged files. Confusing, but I don't see a logic why I should not be able to toggle marks on files that have been recently copied or renamed. Jean