From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
To: Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@russet.org.uk>,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Cc: 40992@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#40992: 27.0.90; Evaluating a function while using edebug breaks
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 17:33:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200501173306.GB22689@ACM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200501155630.GA22689@ACM>
Hello, Phillip and Lars.
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 15:56:30 +0000, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 09:26:44 +0100, Phillip Lord wrote:
> > Edebug fails while tracing a function, if that function is evaluated
> > during the edebug session. The error reported is:
> > Wrong type argument: listp, #<marker at 4045 in hanoi.el>
> > edebug--display-1: Wrong type argument: listp, #<marker at 4045 in hanoi.el>
> > This is a regression as it works in Emacs-26, but fails in Emacs-27.
> Yes. A bit of bisection shows that the commit which introduced this bug
> is:
> commit e8b3a15cb6ff187ce08afcb43bd9a0b7907268ca
> Author: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Date: Sun Oct 20 12:07:42 2019 +0200
> Mark breakpoints in edebug with highlights
> * lisp/emacs-lisp/edebug.el (edebug--overlay-breakpoints)
> (edebug--overlay-breakpoints-remove): New functions (bug#23468).
> (edebug-modify-breakpoint): Use them to highlight breakpoints.
> (edebug--display-1): Restore breakpoint highlights.
> (edebug--recursive-edit): Remove highlights on exit.
> Lars, have you got any comment on this?
> > Reproduction:
> > In clean emacs -q
> > M-x hanoi
> > jump to hanoi function
> > C-u C-M-x
> > M-x hanoi
> > After stepping through into hanoi with point still in
> > C-M-x
> > and step once more.
The cause is now clear. When you instrument a function, the symbol is
given a property 'edebug, whose value is a list of edebug information.
It is this list which edebug--overlay-breakpoints is trying to access
when it throws the error.
When you recompile the function without instrumentation, edebug sets the
'edebug property to the marker #<marker at 4045 in hanoi.el>. This
non-list value of the property acts elsewhere as a signal that the
function isn't instrumented.
This is a fundamental problem, that the edebug information is attached
to the symbol `hanoi' rather than to the (instrumented) function which
is no longer the symbol-function of `hanoi'. Sadly, there is no way of
attaching a property to a function, only to a symbol (or a buffer
position).
There doesn't appear to be a good way of solving this bug. A workable
workaround would be to check that the 'edebug property value is a list
in edebug--overlay-breakpoints, and just to remove the breakpoint
highlights when it's not a list. When it's not a list, it's a marker
pointing to the start of the function, from which the end of the
function can be found, to serve as the END argument to
edebug--overlay-breakpoints-remove.
Or something like that. :-(
> > I use this workflow quite a lot when debugging. I may start to debug a
> > function, decided I have seen enough, to un-instrument so I don't see it
> > debugged again.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-01 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-01 8:26 bug#40992: 27.0.90; Evaluating a function while using edebug breaks Phillip Lord
2020-05-01 15:56 ` Alan Mackenzie
2020-05-01 17:33 ` Alan Mackenzie [this message]
2020-05-01 18:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-05-02 1:43 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-05-02 3:05 ` Noam Postavsky
2020-05-02 7:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-05-02 13:34 ` Alan Mackenzie
2020-05-02 13:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-05-03 11:55 ` Alan Mackenzie
2020-05-03 12:13 ` Alan Mackenzie
2020-05-02 21:54 ` Phillip Lord
2020-05-11 20:16 ` Alan Mackenzie
2020-05-02 13:14 ` Alan Mackenzie
2020-05-04 1:27 ` Pouar Dragon
2020-05-04 18:34 ` Alan Mackenzie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200501173306.GB22689@ACM \
--to=acm@muc.de \
--cc=40992@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=phillip.lord@russet.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.