From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Roland Winkler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is compiling autoloads useful? Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 09:38:37 -0600 Message-ID: <20194.11133.879784.861863@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <20193.57279.774332.141767@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20194.9524.974939.951450@gargle.gargle.HOWL> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323445147 12252 80.91.229.12 (9 Dec 2011 15:39:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 15:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 09 16:39:01 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RZ2XM-0007YR-Cv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 16:39:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40536 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZ2XJ-0000hQ-0x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:38:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZ2XB-0000hF-0Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:38:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZ2X3-00054T-DJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:38:48 -0500 Original-Received: from essmail.ess.niu.edu ([131.156.1.18]:35252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZ2X3-00053s-2n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:38:41 -0500 Original-Received: from regnitz (lukas.physics.niu.edu [131.156.85.221]) by essmail.ess.niu.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pB9Fcc0C021722; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 09:38:38 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.2 trial under 24.0.90.2 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 131.156.1.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146606 Archived-At: On Fri Dec 9 2011 Andreas Schwab wrote: > loaddefs.el is preloaded, so it doesn't matter here. Thanks. What about the other uncompiled files mh-e/mh-loaddefs.el net/tramp-loaddefs.el calendar/cal-loaddefs.el calendar/hol-loaddefs.el calendar/diary-loaddefs.el emacs-lisp/cl-loaddefs.el calc/calc-loaddefs.el cedet/semantic/loaddefs.el cedet/ede/loaddefs.el cedet/srecode/loaddefs.el I assume they are loaded if a particular package such as mh-e is loaded. So they match exactly the kind of situation I have in mind with the file bbdb-autoloads.el (which maybe should be renamed bbdb-loaddefs.el). Roland