On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 05:43:28PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

[...]

> There's no need for "Anti-Glossary" [...]

> > A next step might be to cross-index those "current" terms
> > with the "traditional" ones.
> 
> These are already in the Glossary.

Thanks for the clarifications, Eli. Still, I feel that someone
"entering" this world might be a bit... lost. Obviously some
phantasy is needed to come up with a helpful scheme which doesn't
bring about too much collateral damage?

Cheers
-- tomás