From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35725: 26.2; Fatal error 11: Segmentation fault; Crash on: (find-file "any.svg") Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 19:45:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20190515184519.GA83757@breton.holly.idiocy.org> References: <87zhnq567e.wl-pegzmasta@member.fsf.org> <1ac79901-d3a1-3c3f-1590-d3fc753e4bac@cs.ucla.edu> <87imudfzzt.wl-pegzmasta@member.fsf.org> <871s11sc1f.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <83ftph9g4r.fsf@gnu.org> <25f88d44-9211-8d48-7b01-28c6ccfba88a@cs.ucla.edu> <87h89wilsu.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="155164"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Cc: eggert@gnu.org, pegzmasta@member.fsf.org, 35725@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 15 20:46:18 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQyuv-000e2N-EN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 20:46:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41076 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQyup-0003C0-BD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 14:46:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58983) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQyui-0003Bk-Mb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 14:46:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQyug-00005Y-Qi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 14:46:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39839) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQyuf-0008UL-V5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 14:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQyuf-0006Ui-Rl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 14:46:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Third Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 18:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35725 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35725-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35725.155794593224922 (code B ref 35725); Wed, 15 May 2019 18:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35725) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2019 18:45:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53383 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQyuA-0006Tr-4R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 14:45:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com ([209.85.221.53]:43478) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQyu8-0006TD-FU for 35725@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 14:45:29 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id r4so584500wro.10 for <35725@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:45:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Z2EMvbperAShuDP+bAB1Z1vH1ftd3ZOD9w0Qpk+Q8bw=; b=TnF9Oc5Lyi8JuQd8520kU5Bq9/UDdEiECHU7gTVmWSQ+KLuRmn02W5l1QjL7SmniDU V0nW81+D+IpakpPhChA8ljLV85ebWYWAMBVsMHyaaSmYRReCdFg8FrJTgUEqUZN5AJ+Z RfpRtK/mbBiAG/vTEjRobAu1ZkDYVsDFJwUO7U84fo2r7CaKtILD2HxdEm+3Ub7do+XL gfNLQnl6sBZ7xd0ELDNdbRc69wDkHIRxnVziLBBpDW+lfeZh6KMyBTNrvLHXxvgJwyNA JrEbAB/ot8b0X6UZGVeAbw1xddB/FKByJ7NnqvKA1XAjpEaXNvad3ei0wX8pFeWx9Rsm /OZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Z2EMvbperAShuDP+bAB1Z1vH1ftd3ZOD9w0Qpk+Q8bw=; b=fX8pLbfvRvG0JcxQfU6aHHwKD2V7tiMmsgNm1FHk1SFTVhrnFj0TM9lBLC8XvI2YX/ yRjuerKHDgJGwpxPsiQJF9D3rryYF3lYGxjHICLxbQVy+YpAGEl3h8aKizCgnBB0z4By Cgr6+o+QVA8WnFpyAQiDZMjEXl8oV6eH30YlYBDbmdb/Ytx6O7oYdqt19sZ42eHvYwz+ wYa03qjLdm35sZc989a8WCZK6vCXdKQnj+Jfl+kBc36Vt46LOW18FMcUHeWakTMYLnd5 /w8BcaX4xGIq0hrXeVDSzGvYp6bcqcy1cLSrU5YbBqdVOU0VAmOZigyQQYAIj+a/eNAb LcYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWu0nJoQmZE79Hl8Y8uzcKgf6gdLadQIRqtSjsBI72gdqXpUigQ xg0qa2jIh7nACAxSbDlyQ4I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyNcACN7dw2tQiQuMDyJRozbgLzu/dpg6QO0hyEnVTQbZksYHL9tPXGuHF5DGjqWCJfqrjytA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f548:: with SMTP id j8mr20492203wrp.171.1557945922586; Wed, 15 May 2019 11:45:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from breton.holly.idiocy.org (ip6-2001-08b0-03f8-8129-85f9-9fdd-bdd0-2fbb.holly.idiocy.org. [2001:8b0:3f8:8129:85f9:9fdd:bdd0:2fbb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s11sm4600736wrb.71.2019.05.15.11.45.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 May 2019 11:45:21 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h89wilsu.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159350 Archived-At: On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 02:49:37AM +0200, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > > Right. I thought native scaling had landed en Emacs 27, but I could > also see that images are not scaled correctly in eww (after I pulled the > "disable" patch), so I didn't know what was going on. > > But I see that I can scale images manually (with +/-), so scaling > obviously works, and I'll try to chase down why eww does scaling wrong > now. My money would be on a check for imagemagick that needs to be updated to also check for native scaling. -- Alan Third