all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: <tomas@tuxteam.de>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster?
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 09:30:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190308083055.GA20901@tuxteam.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvlg1q3qal.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 654 bytes --]

On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 12:39:09AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:

[...]

> FWIW, the usual case where lexical-binding leads to bigger&slower code
> is when you pass a lambda-expression to another function and that
> lambda-expression has free variables (in the lexical-binding case, it
> requires building a closure which is rather costly currently, whereas in
> the dynamic-binding case it relies on the dynamic-scoping instead).

Let's see if I got that right: in those cases, the code would (most
probably!) behave differently depending on the binding regime (lexical
vs dynamic), so it would be doing quite different things in each case?

Cheers
-- t

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-08  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-06 23:36 Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster? Hi-Angel
2019-03-08  5:39 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-03-08  8:30   ` tomas [this message]
2019-03-08 13:53     ` Stefan Monnier
2019-03-09  8:21       ` tomas
2019-03-08 13:33   ` Hi-Angel
2019-03-09 15:06     ` Stefan Monnier
2019-03-10 15:16       ` Hi-Angel
2019-03-10 16:14         ` Hi-Angel
2019-03-10 18:07         ` Stefan Monnier
2019-03-10 18:47           ` Hi-Angel
2019-03-10 18:59             ` Stefan Monnier
2019-03-10 19:53               ` Hi-Angel
2019-03-10 20:48                 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-03-10 21:22                   ` Hi-Angel
2019-03-11 19:16                     ` Hi-Angel
2019-03-11 19:26                       ` Stefan Monnier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190308083055.GA20901@tuxteam.de \
    --to=tomas@tuxteam.de \
    --cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.