From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Werner LEMBERG Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33445: Say "U+1F52E" Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 06:44:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <20181121.064435.330967170186046743.wl@gnu.org> References: <875zwrebz0.fsf@jidanni.org> <20181120.224652.842117314591353291.wl@gnu.org> <838t1nhzd2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1542779046 12182 195.159.176.226 (21 Nov 2018 05:44:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 05:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 33445@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: eliz@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 21 06:44:02 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPLIv-00032T-Ga for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 06:44:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37337 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPLL2-0007W4-3q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 00:46:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPLKw-0007Vy-GN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 00:46:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPLKs-0000CZ-Hm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 00:46:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33455) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPLKs-0000CT-DV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 00:46:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPLKs-0000Fu-4P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 00:46:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Werner LEMBERG Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 05:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33445 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 33445-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33445.1542779114925 (code B ref 33445); Wed, 21 Nov 2018 05:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33445) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Nov 2018 05:45:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37713 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPLK6-0000Er-95 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 00:45:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:43407) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gPLK4-0000Ee-7b for 33445@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 00:45:12 -0500 Original-Received: from gnu.org ([91.133.79.89]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lyi0B-1fKoyA46Kd-0166HU; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 06:45:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: <838t1nhzd2.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 27.0.50 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:9IsJV/c+hOIAg9G2VF/SB2v1b83l5i93QWDtJ9Er6O03tXQ7BCF VxI+X4H6kP33/O0/LQcS0PmWLiMrr0DD6WKvBy+21hnKFdXP4Nlx4kgtQUh2sOu35VInLLu ox56KXjyl7NNnbFw3s770/K9v8cqIwGMecpAO+8J5UUGPoPw9b9oIz4ykfJ+l5N9Ie/DGGf oTU6gylv5soNnd15Ft6Rg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:YS3ZKa4Dj08=:L8Gy8kDwfdg9BVFukhVj3P 4mAdJNrrbVr3Ao4qL8W1vjooMre6MZJBS0+xpL4iqr5obD4OV4iZhX+afRuLQbO6NWgxczHXn nZe4W9D6QP3jFyxdWKVtGWi5QaT5Uhx9qyaRASn9CLIioy+8YBVA/iNQi5SS9aQf3qrjErLOx cKn/TdtW2vE5+AsUuvFS+VdbcksxmXDKQttmE1Bd3s+dXMErZhr+Sw9dh2Ksz1jyNS864+UQU R1JPhZY4GLNhkuArtaaST1+C/+EyLNuw8oPVODgttn7/ug0XeeSMDoWLCaLcPPT3Gl0WzZjRp 8LkKW7CXWuJoWEI/+Y/CUuy1ar+SVJf3hA0OnbT7aNfdaTeLe5vP7jAyZZf2atsdZsR5/cYdB JATicQxBBgV9RfKZ30YWhx83KJU5YnaZUMcjjsF4kRB8f8jLa3zX7+1J1bAESiDnwuRVJ5gA4 /GoedUN5lys++JyM5LJl/XE2yxFGl8kOo0lhTlN1FptdgOwAL3eGKsz6ULltMQTT72MmVQwxf ji07IVsFkFWrTUGIvAq7YbxifI6F3ZIHMs7smzI0S6y/OdWAdMnZgXt/d53LjxFoXijHg3iMH x8gZaLfmTx+bZNbg1Xi/TFzwpd1aR6vj9+pfNjZGGBR6bBmrBX96INnNSBKF32SptrfbYo1jr AWMBT2ssJhGJU+ZyCTymbSOxsEQK4tUziDg8+rCFpKims6IcU2nbaJeAK26A70aa5t9B8qAX0 Ip4B44g4dWF8T/p/e8W14S1ZXS4CwTyWPaD5PdW3jWvdQNEGPpwGMhHDSmhR9lkPLmalUhGm X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:152617 Archived-At: >> I second that. It might be a small difference to people who are >> well acquainted with Emacs coding systems. However, I believe that >> Joe User would prefer the `U+' notation. (I have a good knowledge >> of coding systems, and even I would prefer to see the `U+' prefix >> :-) > > This is not about coding systems at all. The codepoint is shown at > least twice in the display, just without the U+ prefix. > > The display produced by that function is already cluttered beyond > hope, so much so that many important details evade you until you > actually read each and every symbol. Well, this is a different issue. > Adding the U+ to them (where, exactly?) would make aa bad situation > even worse, for very little gain. > > The proper Unicode name of the character, CRYSTAL BALL, is shown in > the display. I would like to see U+1F52E CRYSTAL BALL Werner