From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Perry E. Metzger" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is there a way to control where frames get created? Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 07:06:43 -0400 Message-ID: <20181001070643.0c0afc09@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> References: <20180929183701.0b49b97d@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <5BB081FC.8030704@gmx.at> <20180930101435.7b834510@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <20180930104147.4fd8c509@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <5BB10C49.1030106@gmx.at> <20180930143534.24d54ac5@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <5BB1DC44.2090902@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1538391921 22157 195.159.176.226 (1 Oct 2018 11:05:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 11:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 01 13:05:17 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g6w0q-0005dl-2Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 13:05:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37440 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6w2v-00063D-PX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 07:07:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50575) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6w2I-00061u-6G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 07:06:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6w2H-0001Ok-Bl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 07:06:46 -0400 Original-Received: from hacklheber.piermont.com ([2001:470:30:84:e276:63ff:fe62:3400]:35502) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6w2H-0001OB-7U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2018 07:06:45 -0400 Original-Received: from snark.cb.piermont.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hacklheber.piermont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687603EF; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 07:06:44 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from jabberwock.cb.piermont.com (jabberwock.cb.piermont.com [10.160.2.107]) by snark.cb.piermont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6642DFC10; Mon, 1 Oct 2018 07:06:44 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <5BB1DC44.2090902@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2001:470:30:84:e276:63ff:fe62:3400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230180 Archived-At: On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 10:35:16 +0200 martin rudalics wrote: > > This is under MacOS/aqua: [...] > As you can see, your internal border is two pixels wide. And Alan > just noted in the thread of Bug#32882: >=20 > > I wonder if it=E2=80=99s the internal border. It=E2=80=99s not properly > > supported on the NS port for some reason, and therefore should > > always be the background colour. But it defaults to 2 pixels. > > Try: > > > > (set-frame-parameter nil 'internal-border-width 0) =20 >=20 > So please try that before making the new frame. Unfortunately, in > the follow-up Aaron said it would not change anything and I suppose > you will see the same. But yours and Aaron's experience could > eventually lead us to where those two pixels come from. I'll try that out. > BTW the X-position 690 of your new frame is much larger than I would > expect from 0 + 675. So this seems even more broken. No, that's fine. I deliberately added 15 pixels there for a couple of reasons. (I wanted to be able to see if I was obscuring any terminals, a thin strip of the background is good for this purpose. It isn't a bug, I did it myself.) Perry --=20 Perry E. Metzger perry@piermont.com