From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Perry E. Metzger" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is there a way to control where frames get created? Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:07:07 -0400 Message-ID: <20180930140707.17bc4348@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> References: <20180929183701.0b49b97d@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <5BB081FC.8030704@gmx.at> <20180930101435.7b834510@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <20180930104147.4fd8c509@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <5BB10C5A.2050505@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1538330761 30924 195.159.176.226 (30 Sep 2018 18:06:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 30 20:05:57 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g6g6O-0007xC-CF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 20:05:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56414 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6g8U-0006h6-VJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:08:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6g7e-0006gE-VA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:07:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6g7e-0006wl-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:07:14 -0400 Original-Received: from hacklheber.piermont.com ([2001:470:30:84:e276:63ff:fe62:3400]:33236) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6g7e-0006u9-5N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:07:14 -0400 Original-Received: from snark.cb.piermont.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hacklheber.piermont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C060615F; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:07:07 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from jabberwock.cb.piermont.com (jabberwock.cb.piermont.com [10.160.2.107]) by snark.cb.piermont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B452DFC00; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:07:07 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <5BB10C5A.2050505@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2001:470:30:84:e276:63ff:fe62:3400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230175 Archived-At: On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:48:10 +0200 martin rudalics wrote: > > Probably the difference between the position of the inner and the > > outer (decoration) window. > > This would be the first time I hear about such a thing. So far, the > "position" was always the position of the outer frame which includes > the decorations. Also, the difference is only a few pixels, which is smaller than the difference in size between inner and outer. I find it mysterious. This is happening on MacOS native if that's any help to anyone, haven't tried it yet on X11. Perry -- Perry E. Metzger perry@piermont.com