From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30800: 26.0.91; unknown crash on macos Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 10:29:58 +0000 Message-ID: <20180324102958.GB42341@breton.holly.idiocy.org> References: <83fu4tjmdv.fsf@gnu.org> <20180321191903.GA38993@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83d0zxjk5p.fsf@gnu.org> <20180321201234.GA39094@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <834ll8k1tx.fsf@gnu.org> <83po3whzln.fsf@gnu.org> <20180323195210.GA41757@breton.holly.idiocy.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1521887352 21372 195.159.176.226 (24 Mar 2018 10:29:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 10:29:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Cc: 30800@debbugs.gnu.org To: Aaron Jensen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 24 11:29:08 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ezgQ5-0005S3-Ah for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 11:29:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42180 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ezgS8-0006Yz-Pd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 06:31:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ezgS2-0006Yl-Ff for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 06:31:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ezgRy-0006Gq-5Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 06:31:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42575) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ezgRy-0006GK-1D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 06:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ezgRx-0001Ar-M3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 06:31:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Third Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 10:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30800 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 30800-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30800.15218874114452 (code B ref 30800); Sat, 24 Mar 2018 10:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30800) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2018 10:30:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50472 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ezgR9-00019j-BT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 06:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr0-f171.google.com ([209.85.128.171]:46090) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ezgR5-00018J-GX for 30800@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 06:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr0-f171.google.com with SMTP id d1so2380353wrj.13 for <30800@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 03:30:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=3JcWoioNsoKeSHtHTZLA4ItpOhjTTc+ZZO/76fqeDcI=; b=lA520wPNLSxFx0BTuDsEmSYhgX7pEi7ZujjkXCuTbysybRURlZqfndmKLTqgZGtLcf vAiKnH13OwM4EuPIBitXjwob760aeHpA2ert/zHXBmxrblYKeJN5J1vSH1Hb9uu65l4t gRv+IX2kOWHd+62IOtn3Wtnd8T7ziXmrButgUj6kIgo1PNFtgtUoLB73KM7AeqLzvIk6 xVF0xamDLAz5t0Feo2R3MchUs73FUq9uqNGZsDe2oHcmg5rJu98QVtXmrgnVKuIFs7Rp 19eyds2SwdIjEwmXqk7BtgXwLCUzZYmagdvJUSWsdqHt4fCUXR4RwORzsoJbNfjXzs/i xZhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=3JcWoioNsoKeSHtHTZLA4ItpOhjTTc+ZZO/76fqeDcI=; b=X9V8vs+0AP1yr4ogSQrnbgIAHrlqhAYRjSCECZETY+TlibeSKQh9nXskYJj+hwHn8f gLQAZEPBGAdW8/2LxRi+cS+FCJTQlenylXbZT7SRM7wHTkJlzKlM5UrtpHtqChZ2KR6I PjIYpKNYgLTpPtpkaQR0GRJmsgwgboXZXHSogUbLlrW5FPRJsPkampnYxYDAYiuargYO V4uEKgbS4WSiNGI3iSxx82FOWcOwrgMO6DmcYppUJ8NhXHQ9UgenoLZMSE/89im2nSGw r6CR1vCigCoA7zt8LV0R/MgfB5Po2ELffvgzJ3SxcyPdR9yMXowRwJhjGTbLy2eKl68O eEIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7HmyNLT3yYPxcyKpJyI3BkZG/zmn+pI8G36puMHwnjiOfPkK1hx UFzyGl5QSocRJ36lNINXxxg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELti3SiITAHkox8jsk08sERhnijrWGWis9Odg+PNaFfyJG6JTJaWGtTQ+zm7l2brWdQxXn216g== X-Received: by 10.223.188.12 with SMTP id s12mr25751799wrg.266.1521887401647; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 03:30:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from breton.holly.idiocy.org (ip6-2001-08b0-03f8-8129-49b4-4ffa-851a-8ed8.holly.idiocy.org. [2001:8b0:3f8:8129:49b4:4ffa:851a:8ed8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s125sm10481123wmf.4.2018.03.24.03.30.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Mar 2018 03:30:00 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:144574 Archived-At: On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 12:20:11AM -0700, Aaron Jensen wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Alan Third wrote: > > I would like to revert it if only simplify the code, but I don’t feel > > that strongly. It may have been fixed in later releases of 10.10. It > > would be nice if someone using 10.10 could check, but I don’t know who > > could do that. > > Maybe this is a weird idea, but what if we apply my patch, then revert > the code and my patch so that if the flicker returns and the revert is > reverted at least the crash would be fixed? That would be up to Eli, but I think we should at least put your patch in Emacs 26. Anything bigger should go in master. -- Alan Third