From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tak Kunihiro Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: naming of 26.1 mwheel- user options Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 07:50:34 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20180228.075034.1040428230908090900.tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1519773025 25039 195.159.176.226 (27 Feb 2018 23:10:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 23:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 28 00:10:21 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqoO4-00065w-HU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:10:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40606 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqoQ6-00030U-KR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:12:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58360) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqoQ0-00030K-EJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:12:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqoPw-0003ia-C4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:12:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mxl069v64.mxlogic.net ([208.81.69.64]:56221 helo=s18p02o141.mxlogic.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eqoPv-0003db-Mt; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:12:16 -0500 Original-Received: from unknown [42.127.236.175] (EHLO mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp) by s18p02o141.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-8.5.0-1953) with ESMTP id fc5e59a5.7f0cf0bfa700.203111.00-579.285139.s18p02o141.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:12:15 -0700 (MST) X-MXL-Hash: 5a95e5cf6638e5d9-3b3f9cf035cc23079721f456ceeeb951595d5b3d Original-Received: from unknown [42.127.236.175] (EHLO mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp) by s18p02o141.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-8.5.0-1953) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id cb0e59a5.0.202965.00-383.284837.s18p02o141.mxlogic.net (envelope-from ); Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:50:37 -0700 (MST) X-MXL-Hash: 5a95e0bd30b61476-1aa411a501bbfb2fdf8b4c99ff86e3c0ace2188c Original-Received: from alml002.ouadm.okayama-u.ac.jp (unknown [42.127.236.168]) by mlsec.cc.okayama-u.ac.jp with smtp id 5fe1_5d9d_f557edf7_62ca_4adb_aa19_1e8fc16b36aa; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 07:50:33 +0900 Original-Received: from localhost (vesta.misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp [150.46.48.154]) by alml002.ouadm.okayama-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5C784C0AF4; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 07:50:33 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 11 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 5 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.1, EDT_SA_AU_PASS=0, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, EDT_SA_TS_PASS=0, RV6231=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6231> : inlines <6438> : streams <1780223> : uri <2600446> X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.2 cv=Krs94SeN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=8LLPK8U+aGQ6qN8QlyMYtQ==] X-AnalysisOut: [:117 a=8LLPK8U+aGQ6qN8QlyMYtQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=Op4] X-AnalysisOut: [juWPpsa0A:10 a=dKXC5cHAm3z5dMAJ98EA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10] X-Spam: [F=0.5000000000; CM=0.500; MH=0.500(2018022710); S=0.355(2015072901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [42.127.236.175] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 208.81.69.64 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:223145 Archived-At: > For consistency with previous usage, shouldn't the new-in-26.1 > mwheel-* user options in mwheel.el be called "mouse-wheel-"? > (mwheel-tilt-scroll-p etc.) I think so too. I also leaned that to use `-p' at the end of variable is not recommended. `mwheel-wheel-tilt-scroll' instead of `mwheel-tilt-scroll-p'?