From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30350: 27.0.50; Newest master can't run processes on macOS Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 21:12:24 +0000 Message-ID: <20180204211224.GA53263@breton.holly.idiocy.org> References: <20180204210615.GB42949@breton.holly.idiocy.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1517778755 14344 195.159.176.226 (4 Feb 2018 21:12:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 21:12:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Cc: 30350@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 04 22:12:31 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiRaE-0002dz-Cy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 22:12:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40339 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiRcF-0005OB-Gt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 16:14:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiRaz-0004Hm-8r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 16:13:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiRav-0002i4-Vp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 16:13:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49509) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiRav-0002ht-Qi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 16:13:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiRav-00020F-I8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 16:13:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Third Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 21:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30350 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 30350-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30350.15177787537663 (code B ref 30350); Sun, 04 Feb 2018 21:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30350) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2018 21:12:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57406 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiRaT-0001zX-Eg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 16:12:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr0-f174.google.com ([209.85.128.174]:35691) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiRaS-0001zL-F4 for 30350@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 16:12:32 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr0-f174.google.com with SMTP id w50so27682099wrc.2 for <30350@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 13:12:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=6+EZYDVDcrM9NqspNciqPtlD68yhnfBPDuYHTCWbe2A=; b=Ug1tfSuKSrwuSczGoBA5c0xVK+osADjEg00HZortWTSNkhYz2qvinw/9Grn+0khHqH iee9gvOXteGUJPDMS1QGa/rEV6bJq8W4zx4BTnfEbicuiY3rJo6M6I8Xvbao601orW/I 8xmk0NyUMcfsD4CPn+HFYXYJleV9jnRpBW7ELSvHMIsU+vfjUWikhFDOvbtQxGHthJkf VvgEahJ2UKhNCP65Uz3rX+jug4BPF/2y2odskPX3Mv4UbA8MJAeZZcmAbCxh1abEjqgl YMrfMX6ubcN2d1ABklqsFEuGgQ53x7nL6bihedORY9jzJefkBxA7oeHGxYc1oHjEqCw8 RvMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=6+EZYDVDcrM9NqspNciqPtlD68yhnfBPDuYHTCWbe2A=; b=UYQqkwKxUEfOb9xi8svaEyhiQ3sFIR/QPpzdEtvd+y61mlmTGrZ4K1n/5h/usjBiXz fUzkh9+eAP0qyHgW31ffLtw1yWgAnEqYnkwiDnk9jVRxIsBhmlsVBTrRvanXN8BpAiYP QimJD8Sm0ys0io6mlGUJ1uvAO0qAMSeNdpvoWZeLq35WBcq4PIKLfqJuKhjyI1pSYxea 35t+lg96IUrudV4byZFohWPmmq2vRBVZL7Ku/4jONJFBLL7gf+FlptBT0R2/o+h31VcF PLBtTxzbsV8rDL1bTReO4ZLtTW9j0YRETQCg4teETX8NyVaqa1gq+gOezo7oNRCjQ1PS un/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdxNdXsnvsftyeGOUXMkMLjPoFRtOf8AujfyIhIZCsoLPaXYnhm DbhwHW8xsXvA85TCD5JNZLg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224C/Bpi8Lyr4pc6ZUijqycMRXWvKamq9yCKo/yX5+5+PF8qVot47r3QObdHHGTjTLosY0pvDQ== X-Received: by 10.223.171.168 with SMTP id s37mr4694220wrc.154.1517778746839; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 13:12:26 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from breton.holly.idiocy.org (ip6-2001-08b0-03f8-8129-cccf-7143-dd46-9afe.holly.idiocy.org. [2001:8b0:3f8:8129:cccf:7143:dd46:9afe]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d17sm1175876wre.76.2018.02.04.13.12.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 04 Feb 2018 13:12:26 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180204210615.GB42949@breton.holly.idiocy.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:142909 Archived-At: On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 09:06:15PM +0000, Alan Third wrote: > Oddly if you do > > (file-accessible-directory-p "/usr/bin/true") > > it works correctly, but then once you run > > (call-process "/usr/bin/true") > > file-accessible-directory-p incorrectly returns true on subsequent > calls. Paul’s commit didn’t make any real changes to > file-accessible-directory-p so I suspect this problem is older. In fact, I can replicate it on Emacs 25, so it’s an old bug. -- Alan Third