From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug #29083: Is it OK to add a new function to the emacs-26 branch? Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 19:24:28 +0000 Message-ID: <20171102192428.GA4858@ACM> References: <20171101112144.GB5276@ACM> <834lqdss2f.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1509651125 10296 195.159.176.226 (2 Nov 2017 19:32:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 19:32:05 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) To: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 02 20:31:59 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eALDY-00020p-H3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 20:31:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33621 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eALDf-0007Yw-Mu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 15:32:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eALD3-0007Yr-Bx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 15:31:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eALD0-0003pi-8c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 15:31:25 -0400 Original-Received: from ocolin.muc.de ([193.149.48.4]:32072 helo=mail.muc.de) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eALCz-0003oz-Ui for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 15:31:22 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 2372 invoked by uid 3782); 2 Nov 2017 19:31:16 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p548C6BB4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.140.107.180]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Nov 2017 20:31:15 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 4870 invoked by uid 1000); 2 Nov 2017 19:24:28 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 9.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 193.149.48.4 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219871 Archived-At: Hello to you both. On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 12:56:00 -0700, John Wiegley wrote: > >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > AM> However, the OP has requested that a function which actually displays this > AM> name be put into CC Mode. Would it still be OK to do this on the emacs-26 > AM> branch, or is this branch now closed for such things? > >> I think that since we're now prepping for release with pretests out there, > >> it's become too late. Nothing stops us from getting a 26.2 out the door soon > >> after, though. > > That's true, but OTOH a new function that doesn't affect anything (because > > it isn't called from any place) cannot do much harm. So I tend to allow this > > exception. > If you're good with such an addition, Eli, then I'm OK with it too. OK, thanks, I'll do this, but not tonight. > -- > John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F > http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).