From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 26.1 release branch created Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 12:10:41 +0000 Message-ID: <20170930121041.GA4853@ACM> References: <20170922220700.GD7229@ACM> <20170924143939.GC5725@ACM> <20170924194139.GA6793@ACM> <20170925190357.GA4651@ACM> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1506774009 24088 195.159.176.226 (30 Sep 2017 12:20:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 12:20:09 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 30 14:20:03 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dyGkU-0005Ha-6L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 14:20:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39181 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyGkW-0001mD-PH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 08:20:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49606) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyGju-0001lw-5E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 08:19:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyGjq-000275-Ub for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 08:19:26 -0400 Original-Received: from ocolin.muc.de ([193.149.48.4]:22289 helo=mail.muc.de) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyGjq-00024X-NR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 08:19:22 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 60021 invoked by uid 3782); 30 Sep 2017 12:19:17 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p548C7A6A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.140.122.106]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 14:19:15 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 5847 invoked by uid 1000); 30 Sep 2017 12:10:41 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 9.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 193.149.48.4 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218966 Archived-At: Hello, Paul. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 16:36:28 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 09/25/2017 12:03 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: [ .... ] > > How about merging this change into emacs-26 anyway, now? > I now see one minor error in the scratch/customize-quotes patch, which > is that its etc/NEWS file incorrectly states ", except that > 'text-quoting-style' no longer affects the treatment of curved quotes in > format arguments to functions like 'message' and 'format-message'", a > phrase that appears to be a stray leftover from an earlier version of > your proposal. The attached patch fixes that, and also has been rebased > to apply after the scratch/customize-quotes is merged in, so I suggest > that you merge scratch/customize-quotes and that I then apply the > attached patch. OK. What I have done is to apply your patch, with a few changes, in scratch/customize-quotes. These changes concern text-quoting-style being a user option rather than just a variable, acknowledging (with a "seems to") that Emacs doesn't always correctly determine if certain characters are displayable, and adding back the bit about the option being "freely usable". I think that's all. In particular, there is no longer a bit about binding t-q-s to the symbol grave to inhibit quote translation. If you want to check it for one last time, please do, otherwise I think I should just merge it into emacs-26. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).