From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: CVE-2017-14482 - Red Hat Customer Portal Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 16:54:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20170924145401.GA14514@tuxteam.de> References: <2e991bb7-c570-49ce-be94-3654945bb4b5@mousecar.com> <87d16jxjz6.fsf@eps142.cdf.udc.es> <861smzcgx3.fsf@zoho.com> <1b3bec6e-d4d5-37a7-ba54-49bd2d8281bd@yandex.com> <86k20qbcu9.fsf@zoho.com> <86o9q0a8zc.fsf@zoho.com> <87vak8rwcx.fsf@qcore> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1506264891 2611 195.159.176.226 (24 Sep 2017 14:54:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 14:54:51 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 24 16:54:47 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dw8Iw-0000OB-8r for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 16:54:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38445 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dw8J3-0007sA-Dq for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 10:54:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dw8IJ-0007r8-Mz for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 10:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dw8IG-0005eI-LN for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 10:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:32827 helo=tomasium.tuxteam.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dw8IG-0005dp-Ev for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 10:54:04 -0400 Original-Received: from tomas by tomasium.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1dw8ID-00046t-9p for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 16:54:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87vak8rwcx.fsf@qcore> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 5.199.139.25 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:114387 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 04:42:54PM +0200, Óscar Fuentes wrote: [...] > It seems that you think that formal verification says that the software > is correct. That's in theory. Practice is different, as usual. And to embellish this discussion with an Argument by Authority: "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it." http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/faq.html - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlnHxwkACgkQBcgs9XrR2kbRFQCfQcFHXf/zQz4I1zN1ENqbEjRc v/IAnRQLGZc9D74GvaTl+aCMFHhDoa8y =pOWe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----