From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Winston Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28403: 25.2; find-tag works, but xref-find-definitions Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:05 EDT Message-ID: <201709110405.v8B45wO3020652@psr.com> References: <201709092240.v89MeFUo014854@psr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505102775 17575 195.159.176.226 (11 Sep 2017 04:06:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 04:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 28403@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 11 06:06:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drFz3-00042j-Mf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 06:06:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55274 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drFz6-0003Wu-QI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:06:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48293) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drFz0-0003WT-Rk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drFz0-0000Z3-3I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51521) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drFz0-0000Yt-0W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drFyz-0004YZ-PU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:06:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <201709092240.v89MeFUo014854@psr.com> Resent-From: Winston Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 04:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28403 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28403-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28403.150510275917506 (code B ref 28403); Mon, 11 Sep 2017 04:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28403) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2017 04:05:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60202 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drFyw-0004YI-Q8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:05:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.psr.com ([67.212.42.216]:23925 helo=psr.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drFyu-0004Y5-R2 for 28403@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:05:57 -0400 Original-Received: from psr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by psr.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v8B45wZ2020653 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:05:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wbe@psr.com) Original-Received: (from wbe@localhost) by psr.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v8B45wO3020652; Mon, 11 Sep 2017 00:05:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wbe) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:136762 Archived-At: Eli suggested: >>> etags --regex="/[ \t]*\([^ \t]+\)[ \t]+_ARGS/\1/" ... and in reply to my changes said: > It worked with your example. Yes. The difference is a small one: "_ARGS[0-9]" only matches function definition lines, while using only "_ARGS" will also match declarations. >> [Too bad etags doesn't have a way of doing "s/[ \t]+_ARGS[0-9]*//" on >> the lines it normally finds...] > Why do you need that? The idea was that instead of cluttering up the TAGS file with two lines for every tag, such as foo _ARGS2^?foo^A50,100 foo _ARGS2(^?50,100 as a result of using --regex, a post edit that allowed one to do "s/[ \t]+_ARGS[0-9]*//" could simply remove the _ARGS2 part and reduce the default etags line to: foo(^?50,100 thus (I'm guessing) clarifying things a different way. -WBE