From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Winston Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28403: 25.2; find-tag works, but xref-find-definitions Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:06 EDT Message-ID: <201709101906.v8AJ63RK018859@psr.com> References: <201709092240.v89MeFUo014854@psr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=fixed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505070444 22309 195.159.176.226 (10 Sep 2017 19:07:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 19:07:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 28403@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 10 21:07:19 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dr7ZQ-0004u7-G3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 21:07:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53995 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dr7ZX-00085b-EP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:07:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49633) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dr7ZR-00085E-Rt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:07:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dr7ZO-0004vc-Mn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:07:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51008) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dr7ZO-0004vY-JU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:07:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dr7ZO-00070i-Cj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:07:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <201709092240.v89MeFUo014854@psr.com> Resent-From: Winston Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 19:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28403 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28403-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28403.150507036826885 (code B ref 28403); Sun, 10 Sep 2017 19:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28403) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2017 19:06:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59689 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dr7YW-0006zY-DH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:06:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.psr.com ([67.212.42.216]:23284 helo=psr.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dr7YT-0006z3-Bl for 28403@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:06:07 -0400 Original-Received: from psr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by psr.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v8AJ63XT018860 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:06:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wbe@psr.com) Original-Received: (from wbe@localhost) by psr.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v8AJ63RK018859; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:06:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wbe) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:136738 Archived-At: Eli kindly replied: > It is even possible that, given the details I requested above, I will > be able to help you get your use case working with xref, Just thought... (setq etags-leading-function-names true) ? to indicate that function names are always the first thing on their definition lines? -WBE