From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is BSD licence compatible to export with emacs modules? Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:32:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20170728083202.GB15683@tuxteam.de> References: <20170727212013.GD28402@tuxteam.de> <861sp1sgra.fsf@zoho.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1501230971 11249 195.159.176.226 (28 Jul 2017 08:36:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:36:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 28 10:36:04 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1db0kd-0002UP-LX for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:36:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46800 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1db0kj-0004Oq-7e for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 04:36:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1db0gu-0001Ax-Pu for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 04:32:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1db0gq-0005FO-Q7 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 04:32:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:56178 helo=tomasium.tuxteam.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1db0gq-0005EU-Jp for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 04:32:08 -0400 Original-Received: from tomas by tomasium.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1db0gk-00049D-8K for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:32:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <861sp1sgra.fsf@zoho.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 5.199.139.25 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:113900 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:37:45PM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote: > > Yes. BSD is GPL compatible [1]. ( assume it's > > the currently common "modified" or > > "three-clause" license [2] and not the > > original, four-clause license [4], which is > > pretty uncommon these days. The four-clause > > license has this non- advertising clause. > > What's the advantage "these days" using BSD > instead of Debian (or derivative) like everyone > else? Because I heard there is even > a BSD Debian! I think there's a misunderstanding. The OP was talking about a piece of software under the BSD license, not about BSD "the operating system". FWIW, Debian (or derivative) include many important components which are BSD licensed. As to your question... no systemd? (runs for cover ;-P best - -- t -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAll69oIACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZfrgCbBW4kE6i5d+v2Nsf6focyiBqh 3RAAn1hHrcY3BnSdyxsbwtB9JBcn89ZN =mWeO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----