From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mark Oteiza Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26796: 26.0.50; (2 characters) is usually wrong Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 20:41:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20170509004134.gvcm6ltcuxnzas6r@holos.localdomain> References: <87wp9ukwne.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <831ss2f4pz.fsf@gnu.org> <87efw00wm4.fsf@holos> <83tw4vct9k.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1bjcowz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1494290548 14735 195.159.176.226 (9 May 2017 00:42:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 00:42:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306 (1.8.0) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 26796@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 09 02:42:23 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d7tEL-0003Xp-M4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 02:42:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34425 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d7tEI-0005Bg-Pa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 20:42:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d7tE7-0005BF-Lw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 20:42:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d7tE2-0000mn-Uz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 20:42:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57761) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d7tE2-0000mh-RB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 20:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d7tE2-0005Jx-D7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 20:42:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark Oteiza Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 00:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26796 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26796-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26796.149429051320438 (code B ref 26796); Tue, 09 May 2017 00:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26796) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 May 2017 00:41:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60438 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d7tDp-0005JX-JP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 20:41:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt0-f169.google.com ([209.85.216.169]:35417) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d7tDh-0005JE-Q1 for 26796@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 08 May 2017 20:41:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt0-f169.google.com with SMTP id n4so63975396qte.2 for <26796@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 08 May 2017 17:41:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=udel-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=VE3NRW9RFib06UMtW1thQ1ISMIwpqENu25JAe5BbCNc=; b=K52CXNXKLpVIpV3lOkPaD27ICsqXvmrI5I+MjRr8Lqjy2tIw4a6srzBpTG2QijlLaK wJAcgkKAuG2waF67yObQJSTyl9RMVnhenuiGtqsnwVT9wWfSlwYqUsijEJ2tOSQfV0iw CoHIFreLiUzbeCRdrani9CIhhvZclhBPlGJdDYnnNCAVJ3SCMaQnTVDuNtPwc/O5X5pX ZG0T0G7jN7n7m8RLsu/jNfEPtIMF+gT5Qkx97g7lfLRF4I3rj4T7PWZbNzlhOcwcDHJy mFHk4Luj8W8mQP/G3QVv+Zf6Lq/qsax9F9Q26947Y9SYyLt3oST0adgSf1CVYkgkdvdA 46Aw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=VE3NRW9RFib06UMtW1thQ1ISMIwpqENu25JAe5BbCNc=; b=b9q6Z6rhnt0/4rwjGoauh2XiwqWwUqThzgeeoZ36Tq9+nIzgFm+qt18HMGsmng9XIy YiHGIrqK9z/foffw+nb0Q+I0kdAPNnVLW9MwevH+aChhKrrrD9vGg7p5kNm5XOtskfiZ 20620J0jv+nl8NQeFJUtrSwOniEuyV0U3k9KBeusrfzB8VkKmVXe1byVeZ6Dl6Sw+7Tq 3F1eFExMjuh7Xj27BteXaq0M/cJFcyCVrw/Qp2nIdZZv9rW7rYQZt+ISeuTx5ZMzcnYc Vo5HkuGl6L0E3MJHp4ymM+Km2ECIciNAXDJ1VeQwM5QKvGgQ2Oc+8Ene5gnsC0WaZMQ3 unpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDSI0tlLuwjDzwQ8SA010wKbD9oQcIGW7w12gAQV/GrvVkZDLAW luMcj/m/nbx/Q8By X-Received: by 10.200.34.109 with SMTP id p42mr19323887qtp.17.1494290496110; Mon, 08 May 2017 17:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from holos.localdomain (pool-173-64-125-158.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [173.64.125.158]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n19sm10837540qkn.66.2017.05.08.17.41.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 May 2017 17:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by holos.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4AB966ACBD; Mon, 8 May 2017 20:41:34 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83d1bjcowz.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:132388 Archived-At: On 08/05/17 at 07:07pm, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Glenn Morris > > Cc: Mark Oteiza , larsi@gnus.org, 26796@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net > > Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 11:59:52 -0400 > > > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > >> Was there any reason to implement it in the first place? > > > > > > Seems we are back at the discussion we had starting here: > > > > > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-04/msg00219.html > > > > In which, if I read right, literally no-one was in favour of the feature? > > A feature that several people have now spent time debugging, tweaking, > > and documenting, and which will have to be supported going forwards. > > Is this a complaint about something I did? Just wondering. I'm just here to complain that everything stemming from this change, including the bikeshedding about if and how filenames in the message should be quoted (which is just more waste of space) hasn't been reverted yet.