From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Don't merge!!!! But it did. :-( Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:08:26 +0000 Message-ID: <20170328210826.GB22884@acm> References: <20170328201426.GA22884@acm> <737c0b28-9308-f614-2405-75808ddef46a@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490735365 10742 195.159.176.226 (28 Mar 2017 21:09:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:09:25 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 28 23:09:16 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1csyMa-0001Sp-KN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 23:09:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55313 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csyMg-0002KO-Bu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:09:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csyMY-0002JM-DL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:09:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csyMV-0003Jc-2C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:09:10 -0400 Original-Received: from ocolin.muc.de ([193.149.48.4]:28559 helo=mail.muc.de) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1csyMU-0003JC-OE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:09:07 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 78655 invoked by uid 3782); 28 Mar 2017 21:09:04 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p548C6D2E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.140.109.46]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 23:09:03 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 27254 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Mar 2017 21:08:26 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <737c0b28-9308-f614-2405-75808ddef46a@cs.ucla.edu> X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 9.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 193.149.48.4 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213464 Archived-At: Hello, Paul. On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 13:57:33 -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 03/28/2017 01:14 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > To prevent this happening to anybody else, or to me again, I propose to > > enhance the pertinent regexp also to recognise "don't". Any objections? > Sounds good to me. > You might want to replace "n'" with "n['’]" in the regexp. (Now it's > time for me to duck and run. :-) That occurred to me the moment I'd sent my opening post. I _knew_ you'd be getting back to me with it. :-) But yes, I'll put that curly quote into the regexp, too. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).