From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mark Oteiza Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25105: 26.0.50; diff navigation is broken Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 22:09:36 -0500 Message-ID: <20170106030936.GC1101@holos.localdomain> References: <87inpt6lce.fsf@gmail.com> <87tw9dc7bk.fsf@secretsauce.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1483672385 9409 195.159.176.226 (6 Jan 2017 03:13:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 03:13:05 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2+12 (2bc2ec9ac664) (2016-11-26) Cc: 25105@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov , Tino Calancha , npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Dima Kogan Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 06 04:13:00 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPKxd-0001XT-PT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 04:12:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49832 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPKxi-0006Qk-1E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 22:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPKut-0004GS-8j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 22:10:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPKuo-0008EC-A4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 22:10:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57050) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPKuo-0008E4-69 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 22:10:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPKun-00083b-U2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 22:10:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark Oteiza Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 03:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25105 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25105-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25105.148367218530944 (code B ref 25105); Fri, 06 Jan 2017 03:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25105) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2017 03:09:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44216 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPKuX-000832-9l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 22:09:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-f193.google.com ([209.85.220.193]:34884) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPKuV-00082n-Ms for 25105@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 22:09:43 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qk0-f193.google.com with SMTP id u25so60532103qki.2 for <25105@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 19:09:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=udel-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=7exrjTKgxLFO25kYwIDO/TNPfIyc5Bd40fdbAFDPYHI=; b=qxNTnB7nxclbN5PXyoL67jGQSVMcGS/R+D270dCtm96jOeLH/9newb2k97jlF4YkTz fFCglCnp3Nh+00W4TTlHLuW0tCIAuuyaqW+mkqX0G9rTvB4WootdJaYrDWaMZkwrQov5 9BA28VYvq0STY+v9T8Zn4W+ZIi4OVNGTtH7O0pTKcSqO7/Ajs2gPn1bZ7vlpPdKMQgg5 6zea1JsHWHtZpiybcpWyROjAuODxRw/OCo3U+Fp+UcLtb7x+0bdR5jaDO0en220Jnbgv LnmHg64jg/kyOOIhqThTGAID7O7Np41b3vlUzETbGuvJBh3CspYmd3wk59C2m4JfYyCW AU+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=7exrjTKgxLFO25kYwIDO/TNPfIyc5Bd40fdbAFDPYHI=; b=c8YXpCk7Tg7ZDhdmbcBsbLVA2pviTMArR7gs8dDXJcVT4UvWek9h48Z4m6LHZY/EWr LZ9L3OaKpw+2GS9ZNHoob7/QOJtBtoLw4LhSfDwEP/ir5DqT96ElJxbVfg7N69jbWkuv Uciyn7xv+HNo8VB/Fr6Mc+sJ7nF1nL8/uZBnQdYLfORKzU0T2hJcvr3skMN4nY6lImTC 8eYcBHrjUlLu19JPYB6TAvKQJmlfLJnkD5bL2FZCEKT9205N912Ldc5+55cJcqcmCSR3 eueThUeRqTyTtc/QrQMitKxDLH+XPHMYuODF5iB2ZhO36KaIrMWnpe4lUfjZFEqUvB8l ZaHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK9iMoKT9aaWBgrwt8Ih/JZxuRYPki3o0rxwWbSLYzUXIbL5PgKNodP24G9e2yQDHic X-Received: by 10.55.77.134 with SMTP id a128mr5999689qkb.186.1483672178297; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 19:09:38 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from holos.localdomain (pool-173-67-40-97.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [173.67.40.97]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 16sm49402235qtt.38.2017.01.05.19.09.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Jan 2017 19:09:37 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by holos.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F063C60D63; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 22:09:36 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87tw9dc7bk.fsf@secretsauce.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:127808 Archived-At: On 05/01/17 at 05:20pm, Dima Kogan wrote: > Tino Calancha writes: > > > Mark Oteiza writes: > > > >> I am guessing this is a consequence of bug#17544. From -Q: > >> > >> 1. Do C-x v d RET = in a repository with a bunch of worktree changes > >> 2. Hit n. Point is now at the top of the SECOND hunk > >> 3. Go to end of buffer. > >> 4. Hit p. Point is now at the top of the PENULTIMATE hunk > > FWIW, to me this behaviour is very annoying and it has being > > around already a while without a fix (4 months). > > I would propose to revert the commit causing this misbehaviour. > > Then, once the patch is mature enough, it can be pushed again without > > affecting users. > > if this is a "bug", > then the solution is a full revert. With the number of actual bugs (email/format-patch/pre-diff content, and auto refinement) the initial patch caused, perhaps this is best.