From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mark Oteiza Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25105: 26.0.50; diff navigation is broken Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 08:54:32 -0500 Message-ID: <20161225135432.GA1083@holos.localdomain> References: <87h96jn2wl.fsf@udel.edu> <87shq3g1fa.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87a8cafksc.fsf@secretsauce.net> <20161205165540.GA19421@holos.localdomain> <87r35muuzq.fsf@secretsauce.net> <87h95sebss.fsf@secretsauce.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1482674129 18193 195.159.176.226 (25 Dec 2016 13:55:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 13:55:29 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2+8 (b112fd7061fb) (2016-11-26) Cc: 25105@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov , npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Dima Kogan Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 25 14:55:24 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cL9GZ-0002EU-Qj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 14:55:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46973 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cL9Gb-00033O-9w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 08:55:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cL9GV-00030w-8D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 08:55:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cL9GQ-0005bh-F9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 08:55:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39032) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cL9GQ-0005bd-BJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 08:55:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cL9GQ-0004Sr-0I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 08:55:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark Oteiza Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 13:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25105 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25105-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25105.148267408017118 (code B ref 25105); Sun, 25 Dec 2016 13:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25105) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2016 13:54:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54430 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cL9G4-0004S2-14 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 08:54:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-f194.google.com ([209.85.220.194]:36295) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cL9G3-0004Rp-9P for 25105@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 08:54:39 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qk0-f194.google.com with SMTP id h201so22381925qke.3 for <25105@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 05:54:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=udel-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=38rcsfK0pqMmVSe3MYuguJZLB7v7fZDaV1KJqqBNkM0=; b=P+829u9BUfqhi3gskGwLh9Irof3AS7m3QA6SrNt3SmMTXJ59ztKw9jMpqGi15lkV3h j5taaJ3OWuRrLzI0a/FNu2tFoIjKfiB2ZGvS5rTkUPD8K2Pe1WFYeZE0KmXxRWMevYa9 ie8HBXlx7q6PiO649DCWvuGVeH6ZkDdrJOuNegkBBc7GAKD1B1O5AeZh73qjy542mQLg XArp3csOt5jkZbwxvTsUsr+36idMBU+YcIxuweuogJpsQZZKiO+Ar1wHJXMdmjQCIkCM dLGT6Caw/DV9ctULNwXMJYaye2KEkGy+uPslA7cBSYRuzpcojOrx+rS/HFYq4FtZOqqh mWBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=38rcsfK0pqMmVSe3MYuguJZLB7v7fZDaV1KJqqBNkM0=; b=gXY28dRk0kMf7sIXu3YPrXsUaitwZ32Vf70IfIn+cqCam/lzWqwtEj8gP5s8yI9CfT RY4umbdRvJINO7OrN4aCFfjkR43zS3P2tDzdHVjICTtDKdmF9Zob9WfaE0UrmZmigEIJ FDTgx+cITJYU0F7yDkm7WJ0Vl6r2NWSXBEZzFC6kjZs5LFeDEBmDgRMbRnw3yZtmQcNN 2K47zm0qLkMjlFIprSx+G1B1jATSo+k9FkSRihB3lgchMR6cMSO+pNCGHhjR9LuaIPwh kUhC4o1a9n4WG33tGGeV5XY/RgWFv6l1h40T/GJqdX0uxWjYOOjSYZ0pIXYea5tv5DFh yqfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLOIxXNxkhwh7COAVtiZ8iC3fW0BaA+iSzmHoFgt/jT9EPssU+0tag1BrqRsrt7GpvP X-Received: by 10.55.109.133 with SMTP id i127mr25325603qkc.295.1482674073793; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 05:54:33 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from holos.localdomain ([69.250.222.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c198sm24316601qka.48.2016.12.25.05.54.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 25 Dec 2016 05:54:32 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by holos.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 10D7266143; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 08:54:32 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h95sebss.fsf@secretsauce.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:127438 Archived-At: On 24/12/16 at 10:57pm, Dima Kogan wrote: > Dima Kogan writes: > > > Mark Oteiza writes: > > > >> I find it very hard to believe that the behavior in the second recipe > >> is intentional. > > > > I missed that part of the bug report. Sorry about that. That is a bug > > that I haven't seen at all earlier. Will look at fixing it today or > > tomorrow. Thanks for reporting. > > I pushed the fix to this. What do yall want to do about the other logic? > Are any of yall planning to revisit this? If not, let's close this bug. I will be revisiting this, just haven't gotten around to it.