From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mark Oteiza Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25105: 26.0.50; diff navigation is broken Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 11:55:40 -0500 Message-ID: <20161205165540.GA19421@holos.localdomain> References: <87h96jn2wl.fsf@udel.edu> <87shq3g1fa.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87a8cafksc.fsf@secretsauce.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480957584 1590 195.159.176.226 (5 Dec 2016 17:06:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 17:06:24 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1+65 (d6c10244793f) (2016-10-04) Cc: 25105@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov , npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Dima Kogan Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 05 18:06:20 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDwiZ-0007jw-3f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 18:06:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43296 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDwic-0007cg-Lj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 12:06:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49739) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDwYg-0007m8-JQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:56:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDwYc-0002fy-Ed for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:56:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41796) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDwYc-0002fe-Aa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDwYc-0003lV-0x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark Oteiza Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 16:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25105 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25105-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25105.148095695014454 (code B ref 25105); Mon, 05 Dec 2016 16:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25105) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2016 16:55:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57195 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDwYQ-0003l4-3t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:55:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:36699) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDwYO-0003kq-H8 for 25105@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 11:55:49 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id n21so352311190qka.3 for <25105@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 08:55:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=udel-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=soNCSDyapjC2JmUzfzHNcg9S2P5/CBbhDXgaHe3ucho=; b=IaT7H34N5pozWCsGV7uZB00Uxyr7qWhVc66cXGPb8D2jFnSgb0Fc0PNKNy6I3B1WCa Twca/ufc9NCTUzTHIWhQyz83FF5xMUAbp3TuHAIrqauEYOIUyM7Nnwzs8rJHXIPGKZD2 AarQVEW+wY6uhZW4UpecVWpDXiwXpxCDMjMW3KlKEbdXrkYOT45YyBSAAaCoIVYN1gMt +J5vXZ7w7crohEb1jzL6eiUJCvJKQ4sMwzO02bqQatYb0moWvLntZjnOGDBUiBzG1P+D +b+vFwC9sBoUEmT+qfl51lk/MBqu32//tYUJt3WFqnvFLJb5XJcdgs5QRFt3RvuQrOYR p9Zg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=soNCSDyapjC2JmUzfzHNcg9S2P5/CBbhDXgaHe3ucho=; b=Ic2aTD6OTSTiDFUfQ1K7/XS8+L6WnVIMRDgvV7Uqd9RWLWx0hygiYm+ijXqfCdpLCD A+sJe1MC2UuI8DlFUP94/8T0JuikrIyGGzGB3Z1O2TP1gcwckxz1L/+xNV93g+f1+Vi7 xBbCwiIUDx0XznIozEP/thDDnTN8Ea64rEF7al+QXHz2Y1pm6iPrMDkWcd9aZiXbRf6k YOlhRkYICnOR0/lZmpaJxQnQCMHitGr/HZc2RZS49BvkBN4eCDBKRYU19QWToK/52Q6b Y+bxNsuGVyMnSyp1lIigILRAUEUUlt5OJroAPr5D4xxPnwSkFf82d23nTF7jOSHj8Ise c+fQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC015Om42u87/rAcqOU3m7bowEUq3kart4zYtDAy+jJfTHrqCYKqkp9RmcJrjbvOBJGyv X-Received: by 10.55.170.131 with SMTP id t125mr50415708qke.15.1480956942789; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 08:55:42 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from holos.localdomain ([69.250.222.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i19sm9853732qte.8.2016.12.05.08.55.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Dec 2016 08:55:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by holos.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EB93760D63; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 11:55:40 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126513 Archived-At: On 05/12/16 at 08:33am, Dima Kogan wrote: > On December 5, 2016 7:53:41 AM PST, Dmitry Gutov > wrote: > >On 05.12.2016 17:38, Dima Kogan wrote: > > > >> Hi. These are intentional. Justification: > > > >Which are intentional? I've described some legitimate problems in the > >emacs-devel email. > > Sorry I wasn't clear. The points in the bug report were intentional. > The auto-refinement breakage you described on the list was not, and > I'll look at fixing it later today or tomorrow. My mail farted, and > the message to the list to that effect apparently didn't make it I find it very hard to believe that the behavior in the second recipe is intentional.