From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24579: [PATCH] borderless windows on OS X Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 16:07:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20161002150745.GA58717@breton.holly.idiocy.org> References: <20161001212613.GA40646@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20161001230457.GA50451@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <496bdc1e-b673-228c-d253-b0eef6e08c21@gmail.com> <57F0C5A2.1060206@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475420906 17996 195.159.176.226 (2 Oct 2016 15:08:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 15:08:26 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) Cc: 24579@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 02 17:08:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqiNC-0003GD-Ao for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 17:08:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59766 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqiNA-0005JI-UE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 11:08:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52073) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqiN5-0005JC-22 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 11:08:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqiN0-0006rq-S7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 11:08:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35886) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqiN0-0006rW-ND for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 11:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqiMz-0000Fs-Qh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 11:08:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Third Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2016 15:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24579 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 24579-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24579.1475420875966 (code B ref 24579); Sun, 02 Oct 2016 15:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24579) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2016 15:07:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42076 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqiMt-0000FW-E3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 11:07:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:37908) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqiMs-0000FI-42 for 24579@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 11:07:54 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id p138so107789068wmb.1 for <24579@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 08:07:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=PDUW1Qbr2p0iPKh3boyk4g/UbvTqBOzn7lKlkYbpjWA=; b=Z8c43x8v8bBmf0vGZtQ2YGmB4sfsx6TjO9kV8UY4qTnjWeH2zwD4q2be+GPIWCFgzG p5iGrfaqlEx9TcexR2z/fQrST4j1rSrG8kO+q+rmotKv3drxsJvnv6+r7uTdO7EijpDT ENEy7iYiVGpEZZk9WsqkRwO7STLIcoE/zNszuYBuvgh8HmZF0f9BKRSrrpHsqW/i1ecq X/jGRNRd/gf9t6YNmGnziV7qM+rEY5SDYA8LqAvVsFgBAagP/BUad9bkO1wzsJ0iXGRm nkJQ7wlaasbIh6aYJflb3uNkSgxYUaeG4QyUV6pZSmzshngcWzJ4crXrTITa1ioNPkqs mmXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=PDUW1Qbr2p0iPKh3boyk4g/UbvTqBOzn7lKlkYbpjWA=; b=YCcmZYZvQtFxOozOFNasEJoM0Dn+inH9xYwyTjoeXD5BmuybErNMAyDf/IFRxjHUT4 F961I4DkkXvzVXnOYdx3HeNn0tA9GlOW/CiiX+6XxA4kUDB2i9HOiQ3AtxzeBjaHvtSX MwJZxugvummNVlQHgDHsrNeVEJFlbJw2LxQVZSrrjZ7kKFlMm9H5ZT3i2iyJdpFsp7Fv XMl4/gkuYK98MOUH+9kefUgNjXGXrj10dfw42sDe90u3Rncv7t3vv1jXdy+fk5JxB8hm B+N/qvTZSHsPEW5TnPQg0TpirZNLS0AlAiXgu/ngzJxdKBCPMec/YSyzSEUJM/mBk2Vq eE5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkBTVwv5UU0/x1NS1jaRQe6g6nXUf2Ob0x+VRseA6xt5HgfF856h2HKhWvyRObdGg== X-Received: by 10.194.161.166 with SMTP id xt6mr13960298wjb.165.1475420868373; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 08:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from breton.holly.idiocy.org (ip6-2001-08b0-03f8-8129-148d-3f02-0cb7-1071.holly.idiocy.org. [2001:8b0:3f8:8129:148d:3f02:cb7:1071]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 4sm14329876wmu.2.2016.10.02.08.07.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 02 Oct 2016 08:07:47 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57F0C5A2.1060206@gmx.at> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:123897 Archived-At: On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 10:30:26AM +0200, martin rudalics wrote: > > This looks good indeed, but we don't have the same thing exposed to > > ELisp for GNU/Linux, do we? > > We do: Emacs' native tooltip frames with a ‘border-width’ of zero should > accomplish precisely that. Do we not have them in NS too? If so that would make this patch rather superfluous. > > Isn't that a prerequisite before merging this > > feature? I hadn’t even really thought about this, I figured that on GNU/Linux systems you can get the same behaviour through the window manager, but that’s impossible on OS X. I can see the other argument, though. I’ll hold off committing until there’s some sort of agreement. -- Alan Third