From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23827: 25.1.50; tab-width file-local variable has no effect in etc/HELLO Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:10:54 +0000 Message-ID: <20160628101054.GB3181@acm.fritz.box> References: <20160624110713.13909.qmail@mail.muc.de> <83vb0y1zsb.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3bm1xjz.fsf@gnu.org> <20160624160927.GB2961@acm.fritz.box> <20160627125247.GC4526@acm.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467108692 3236 80.91.229.3 (28 Jun 2016 10:11:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23827@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 28 12:11:21 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bHpzE-0002gw-TV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:11:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35604 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHpzE-0006O9-47 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 06:11:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50630) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHpz2-0006Jd-8P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 06:11:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHpyw-0002WR-7K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 06:11:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46396) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHpyw-0002WN-3v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 06:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHpyv-0007zx-UU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 06:11:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23827 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23827-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23827.146710865130727 (code B ref 23827); Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23827) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2016 10:10:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58733 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHpyl-0007zX-Do for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 06:10:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.muc.de ([193.149.48.3]:61137) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHpyj-0007zO-8e for 23827@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 06:10:49 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 1992 invoked by uid 3782); 28 Jun 2016 10:10:47 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p4FC46485.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.196.100.133]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:10:45 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 3360 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Jun 2016 10:10:54 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:120174 Archived-At: Hello, Stefan. On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 06:03:50PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > If you've had any more concerns about it, I could always revert it for > > the time being. Have you had any more such concerns? > I still have the question whether with-temp-buffer is affected. > If it is, yes, that's a real concern. If not, the patch is fine. I think the temp-buffer will pick up any .dir-locals from its "current directory", where the current directory is merely that of the buffer which was current when the temp-buffer was created. I wish I didn't have to say that. > Stefan -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).