From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23827: 25.1.50; tab-width file-local variable has no effect in etc/HELLO Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:52:47 +0000 Message-ID: <20160627125247.GC4526@acm.fritz.box> References: <20160624110713.13909.qmail@mail.muc.de> <83vb0y1zsb.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3bm1xjz.fsf@gnu.org> <20160624160927.GB2961@acm.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467032003 7388 80.91.229.3 (27 Jun 2016 12:53:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23827@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 27 14:53:15 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bHW2M-0003dG-I4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:53:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58514 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHW2L-0001kl-LS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:53:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57027) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHW2C-0001jN-TH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:53:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHW2A-000664-9n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:53:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45224) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bHW2A-00065y-6H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHW29-0000vd-SO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:53:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23827 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23827-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23827.14670319613538 (code B ref 23827); Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23827) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2016 12:52:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57561 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHW1p-0000v0-Kh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:52:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.muc.de ([193.149.48.3]:31677) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bHW1n-0000ur-TV for 23827@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:52:40 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 46446 invoked by uid 3782); 27 Jun 2016 12:52:38 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p548C72E2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.140.114.226]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:52:36 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 5243 invoked by uid 1000); 27 Jun 2016 12:52:47 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:120146 Archived-At: Hello, Stefan. On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:21:35PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > I rather think a buffer made by `with-temp-buffer' will run > > `hack-local-variables', but since there will never be a local variables > > section in the new buffer, what are we worrying about? > Why such a hurry? Well, it seemed the discussion was over, and it felt like the sort of bug which was annoying somebody. So, why hang around? If you've had any more concerns about it, I could always revert it for the time being. Have you had any more such concerns? > Stefan -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).