From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23827: 25.1.50; tab-width file-local variable has no effect in etc/HELLO Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:09:27 +0000 Message-ID: <20160624160927.GB2961@acm.fritz.box> References: <20160624110713.13909.qmail@mail.muc.de> <83vb0y1zsb.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3bm1xjz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466784912 13425 80.91.229.3 (24 Jun 2016 16:15:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23827@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 24 18:15:03 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bGTl0-0004wx-Jn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:15:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44737 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGTkz-0005aZ-Q5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:15:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35737) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGTgI-0000OP-Ux for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:10:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGTgA-0001ze-R0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:10:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGTgA-0001zW-Mo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGTgA-0007F7-1j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23827 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23827-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23827.146678455927788 (code B ref 23827); Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23827) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2016 16:09:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54530 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGTfS-0007E8-TF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:09:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.muc.de ([193.149.48.3]:59797) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGTfQ-0007Dz-KK for 23827@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 12:09:17 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 21341 invoked by uid 3782); 24 Jun 2016 16:09:14 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (p548C6EAF.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.140.110.175]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:09:13 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 8853 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Jun 2016 16:09:27 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:120009 Archived-At: Hello, Stefan and Eli. On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:27:06AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > So you suggest to have a variable whose value could bypass calling > > fundamental-mode, and bind that variable inside with-temp-buffer and > > such likes? > Actually, not really, I was rather asking whether this change would > cause with-temp-buffer to run hack-local-variables. I've installed the patch into master. I rather think a buffer made by `with-temp-buffer' will run `hack-local-variables', but since there will never be a local variables section in the new buffer, what are we worrying about? > If it does, then I think that's an undesirable side-effect and we > should try and find some way around it Why? > Stefan -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).