From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Oteiza Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22440: 25.1.50; package.el fails to install with package-check-signature t Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 12:44:05 -0400 Message-ID: <20160518164405.GA9932@holos.localdomain> References: <87a8nxxgqu.fsf@udel.edu> <57381F2D.70007@cs.ucla.edu> <3ea72c05-4bdb-3301-aead-ea7eb25947bc@yandex.ru> <5738A8D5.5030206@cs.ucla.edu> <1fe8c642-202d-a037-5125-8fb733e5f414@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1463590553 23313 80.91.229.3 (18 May 2016 16:55:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 16:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22440@debbugs.gnu.org, Artur Malabarba , Paul Eggert To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 18 18:55:43 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b34l5-0005oh-Cs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 18:55:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46135 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b34l4-00015D-Ft for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:55:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47314) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b34ap-0008Ow-Aa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b34ak-0002iP-Dc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:45:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44809) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b34ak-0002iJ-8r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b34ak-0004ZR-0m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark Oteiza Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 16:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22440 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: security Original-Received: via spool by 22440-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22440.146358985417503 (code B ref 22440); Wed, 18 May 2016 16:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22440) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2016 16:44:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57146 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b34Zx-0004YF-Ly for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:44:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f175.google.com ([209.85.161.175]:33467) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b34Zw-0004Y3-3o for 22440@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:44:12 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-yw0-f175.google.com with SMTP id x194so53846201ywd.0 for <22440@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 09:44:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=udel-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=52tlz9YmYM5l5bM+ONTdTp8A5vWae9bfEnlIQaXjH+c=; b=0Y/epYErgy/+cYW6l3QOhHKNU5UHc5PZX7sGBvPJYVNOwjPvKSnrvSw0phh7Qbw5fR cYfSVxHnfKtRz8KQY7WldjMt1BpyF+6P1aH2SR43ue4e65WekNC9RPwY3/FVHvTpHNGY rcUSr+6sg/UvU+SCgXV4GRcdIyzn1ku2iSfXQq+FQkBWvBGJ0ZFaDivYtvOuQYxYemRW buOblmppj0bRPuzA+ghcWvcBK0eLHU/ztQ2ppCo/d+r49KyItKDL+vR81mcEkRvgqo2l Jr6Z7t9XWaryvVhXUUK6jxNsnr+IqmlOLO7KcfIBg86yI3YJ52J4cRJUZeJF9uxIwb/i v5Cg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=52tlz9YmYM5l5bM+ONTdTp8A5vWae9bfEnlIQaXjH+c=; b=aPS2uSOLV2eU5FdXPlyMPKiJlJgAWuuSNFequkNHtWi7yaU39O9cAQYXRFdxWvYv1S Z8ssLgstEcMi4V/cHC5kVtM7C5VigaJoR/qL4oPfPkSgnpmp/mmScrOTTO7ub2w5h53X BHt9tLWPgZjS6lyguAvJ45Ctol/djmssqZCQjKWXsVr5ealM6WkHiNqd/WzXv8I6O5Pe 3gK6SZCl4Eorfp2Ngin75fZOZkYezD175NdBhf66/YLQmNZN7sHx0Lhz42poTWIVg9Qv 3kw2kmHf/gygrIZ3+V36veGiMP2y5dPRi7OusAWt25uyJv8gRC5VEoM+JT3Nuz3qegSf +d0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWax/6Xuam0syH5J2C/AvRC+Qk6XfuXDSmfiGWqM26vmID/nQ+ucf44Z5DHq53hb/8Y X-Received: by 10.129.76.147 with SMTP id z141mr4464919ywa.136.1463589846526; Wed, 18 May 2016 09:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from holos.localdomain (pool-96-227-83-242.phlapa.fios.verizon.net. [96.227.83.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i188sm5397246ywc.19.2016.05.18.09.44.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 May 2016 09:44:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by holos.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E40069793; Wed, 18 May 2016 12:44:05 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1fe8c642-202d-a037-5125-8fb733e5f414@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1+5 (b74dfb9fa901) (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:118400 Archived-At: On 18/05/16 at 07:36pm, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 05/18/2016 04:50 PM, Artur Malabarba wrote: > > I couldn't reproduce this, so it might have been fixed already. > > Mark, could you check if this has been fixed for you? > > I've just tried (setq package-check-signature t), and then installing async > 1.6, and the problem was there. > > Not the most recent Emacs, though (revision 1a5a05c). Mine is a little older, and I must retract my previous email. Apparently after doing M-x list-packages, package-check-signature is allow-unsigned again, not t. I have to (setq package-check-signature t) after list-packages now. The issue persists. FWIW my version is 2eb6817