From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Brendan O'Dea Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19152: 25.0.50; Suggestions for M-x commands Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:37:04 +1100 Message-ID: <20160309113704.GA2217@ecopc.c47.org> References: <87y4r77jbn.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <87lhn2uodm.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <877fyaqryh.fsf_-_@violet.siamics.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457540845 13991 80.91.229.3 (9 Mar 2016 16:27:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 16:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19152@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 09 17:27:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1adgx5-0001kq-2T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 17:27:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42440 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adgx4-000193-J2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 11:27:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adgx0-00018m-Oo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 11:27:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adgww-0002hI-O9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 11:27:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44589) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adgww-0002gp-J8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 11:27:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1adgww-0001d4-7P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 11:27:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Brendan O'Dea Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19152 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19152-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19152.14575408096241 (code B ref 19152); Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19152) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2016 16:26:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41716 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1adgwj-0001cb-Hi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 11:26:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:36474) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1adcQW-0001KR-Mx for 19152@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 06:37:17 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u190so9064991pfb.3 for <19152@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 03:37:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=c47-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=WjwbDf1LGoN/Rmsogbgmf7tch134hEDa2jP4EcLzjQk=; b=kquUECq6tAFRO2zkTWBTS2L1GMSe71w22xXO5vc29gmnZe0aWfJS004mY0pH016Vt+ tmF6Da/k/y14nh/nqe00hW+NPnlsRlI0MpB7SDxXCokmMmXWf38UeRk1HBE5NqTj0Vnh HXq7GYL0fU7Sh0U1ttur+c9sHIs+1DB42ILS+Gj9qK4z6lFKr6hDsuk+jpTjbK1UcUNV SNTxxW3AuNsDLwFVxpHkSLZx2tNP2VBKfuaWvL9vnZNZGkChgTUHSfRQ9DXgSsa4ighn D1Qvs3qUq5FhGxT9vW8EwnLKO7KuKHE5pQjrNkM5ahYBDzDxVZTyrETiUAZZGTq63KUY UECA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WjwbDf1LGoN/Rmsogbgmf7tch134hEDa2jP4EcLzjQk=; b=gK1Ps0JoyXiD8nJkDR2AdK6W+fmPqjlnGOT+vKBidLX7FdGzR+cIn/KeH3oysXADoK +D8VpCX03g6itliZhSxs9RGQW/HFnyIncvrASYIVcrzbA3CFD1y0fa384G7Ar6J7N3Xn NYoxLwBzyZ18z/ukZWn9/Yoej51g97S9GLNJdesIGZzFlH91auR19OCeJ4vTHpVHv2aZ /BzBmfTT36iZSzJnnpZLRQ5Ng+bgIz7vXUvWrS/yHgSJ9JnE9s3OAwUFZTnkUjEpo44k RO2S7mWZ2DaALUe5hYeqCE3phUVDmF/yeKrUMVITTErjZ5w+Mup/BS4PTKEAm/JUG5xj yrIA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKl9NParRNzSPbiKkFUn/xnSG4Eb9kz+CsyFqZ4KeN/UNU2ifQ4i3iXXOFBmqULLA== X-Received: by 10.98.9.219 with SMTP id 88mr50401753pfj.0.1457523430905; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 03:37:10 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ecopc.c47.org (c211-30-199-232.artrmn3.nsw.optusnet.com.au. [211.30.199.232]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k65sm11835621pfb.30.2016.03.09.03.37.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Mar 2016 03:37:10 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 11:26:48 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:114646 Archived-At: On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 08:57:55AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Well, ac4532a23265 (2014-11-28 23:14:38Z) indeed fixes the issue >> above, but not quite #19152 as initially reported (below), which >> still needs something like the change I’ve previously suggested >> [1]. > >Indeed, this patch hasn't been installed yet. Could someone take care >of it? The suggested change[1] still doesn't appear to have been applied. I can advise the function out of existance as per [2], but a configuration option would ssem to be preferable. What needs to be done to get that patch applied? [1] http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19152#68 [2] http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19152#56 --bod