Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

[Haines Brown]

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 04:02:39PM +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote:

> > > > > > Why Jessie is being identified as Wheezy is another question.
> > > > > > Is there any reason why you might get identified as Ubuntu
> > > > > > 12.04?  Another of the things that has just dropped off Google's
> > > > > > cliff.

> > > > Glad we have solved the mystery - though sadly not your problem. :-(
> > >
> > > A potential solution to the problem would be Jessie proper, but without
> > > systemd.  It seems to work rather well, in fact, from what people doing
> > > so say.  I am about to cross my fingers and try it myself.
> > > Lisi

> > In thinking about it, I'm not sure now if I installed the devuan ISO or
> > debian Jessie and then removed systemd. As I tell my wife, I always am
> > thinking about higher things! How would I know at this point which I
> > did?

> But if you installed Jessie proper without systemd you shouldn't be
> having the Google-Chrome problems - and we are back to square one!!
> Lisi

That's a third option: remove systemd from jessie, install jessie
without systemd (not sure to do it), and devuan. My question remains,
however, albeit OT, how do I figure out which option I used? Uname -a
tells me the system is debian.

Haines

Re: binary-i386 packages missing in Release file

[Robert Thorpe]

Haines Brown <haines@histomat.net> writes:

> That's a third option: remove systemd from jessie, install jessie
> without systemd (not sure to do it), and devuan. My question remains,
> however, albeit OT, how do I figure out which option I used? Uname -a
> tells me the system is debian.
>
> Haines

Are you sure you sent this to the right email list?

I can't see anything about Emacs and I can't see the context emails
anywhere.

BR,
Robert Thorpe