From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21953: Eliminate warnings in the emacs-25 release branch Date: 24 Nov 2015 19:55:43 -0000 Organization: muc.de e.V. Message-ID: <20151124195543.33077.qmail@mail.muc.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448394982 31597 80.91.229.3 (24 Nov 2015 19:56:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dmitry Gutov To: 21953@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 24 20:56:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a1Jh9-0001eL-LG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:56:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41118 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1JhA-0006Y1-Pr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:56:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55675) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1Jh7-0006Xu-H5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:56:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1Jh4-0002tb-Ca for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:56:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1Jh4-0002tX-9K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a1Jh3-0007Se-Vo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21953 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21953.144839494828659 (code B ref 21953); Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2015 19:55:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51661 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a1Jgp-0007SA-FS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:55:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.muc.de ([193.149.48.3]:54886) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a1Jgn-0007S1-8L for 21953@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:55:46 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 33078 invoked by uid 3782); 24 Nov 2015 19:55:43 -0000 In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug User-Agent: tin/2.3.1-20141224 ("Tallant") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/10.1-RELEASE-p16 (amd64)) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109192 Archived-At: In article you wrote: > On 11/19/2015 04:06 AM, John Wiegley wrote: >> I've never worked on a project where getting to warning free was not both >> achievable, and a good idea. > What will you get, as a result? > I can get behind taking care of "correctness" warnings, but if we lose > the obsolete functions warnings, we risk forgetting to take care of > their causes. > And it's not like we can actually fix all instances of obsolete usages > before the current release: a significant part of the warnings comes > from gnus, org, cc-mode ..... Sir, I take exception to that! :-) Last time I looked (about 10 minutes ago), CC Mode produced but a single byte compiler warning. > .... and calendar, all of which, I'm assuming, have to support older > Emacsen. That partly explains the warning left in CC Mode, yes. > We _should_ be able to take care of CEDET warnings, but probably after > their development migrates here. -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).