From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Future emacs mailing lists. [Was: On the popularity of git]
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 11:12:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151104111203.GB1736@acm.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2y4eedelm.fsf@newartisans.com>
Hello, John.
Congratulations on your appointment as Emacs maintainer, and thanks for
taking it up.
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 03:15:17PM -0500, John Wiegley wrote:
[ .... ]
> In the future, I think it has come time to establish a Code of Conduct, along
> with a transition to a passively moderated list: one where all posts are
> allowed by default, but those who disregard the CoC will lose their right to
> post until the end of a waiting period.
> I appreciate that some do not see this as a problem or disagree with my
> assessment (Hi, Juanma, thanks for your support btw :). But needless to say, I
> know of several people (personally, in meat-space) who do not participate here
> because of these problems, and I'm willing to make some changes to bring these
> people back into the fold.
> For the purposes of Emacs development (aka, emacs-devel), I would much rather
> have a semi-professional atmosphere focused on improving Emacs, than an
> easy-going social atmosphere focused on eloquent debates. That belongs on
> another list -- and in fact, creation of just such a list is in process and
> will be announced by Richard or myself shortly.
For that other list, the more social one, to flourish, there will need
to be a convention of switching threads from emacs-devel to
emacs-social/emacs-off-topic/emacs-whatever. Most (?all) of the long
rambling threads that plague emacs-devel start from legitimate on-topic
discussion. It may become part of your role as project head to call for
a switch to the other (new) group, but hopefully most people will sense
the right time themselves.
As mechanism for the switching, the Mail-followup-to: header (or
whatever it's called) should do the trick, I think.
> For those who've actually read to the end of this message: Richard and I met
> at MIT yesterday, where I officially accepted the role as maintainer of Emacs.
> An announcement is forthcoming, once we dot the i's and cross the t's. It's
> also why I've switched my subscription address to johnw@gnu.org, and would
> appreciate if Emacs-related issues are sent there, rather than to my other
> accounts.
johnw@gnu.org it is, then.
> Toward a better future, and much happy hacking!
And to yourself too, sir!
> John Wiegley
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-04 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-28 19:20 Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches? Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-28 19:44 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-28 20:00 ` Steinar Bang
2015-10-28 20:04 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2015-10-28 20:10 ` Alex Bennée
2015-10-28 22:32 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-28 22:56 ` Xue Fuqiao
2015-10-28 22:59 ` Óscar Fuentes
2015-10-28 23:53 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-29 0:17 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-10-29 0:28 ` Michael Heerdegen
2015-10-29 0:49 ` Michael Heerdegen
2015-10-29 2:25 ` Yuri Khan
2015-10-29 8:21 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-29 12:35 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-29 13:21 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-29 17:02 ` On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?] Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-29 17:22 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-29 18:08 ` John Wiegley
2015-10-30 7:48 ` Paul Eggert
2015-10-30 9:27 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-30 9:48 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-30 10:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-30 21:44 ` Paul Eggert
2015-10-30 9:09 ` joakim
2015-10-30 10:49 ` Yuri Khan
2015-10-31 3:16 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2015-10-31 8:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-31 8:32 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-10-31 11:35 ` Oleh Krehel
2015-10-31 12:19 ` David Kastrup
2015-11-02 22:01 ` Nikolaus Rath
2015-11-03 8:42 ` David Kastrup
2015-11-03 17:38 ` Nikolaus Rath
2015-10-31 16:02 ` On the popularity of git Stephen J. Turnbull
2015-11-01 8:08 ` Uwe Brauer
2015-10-31 16:50 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-31 16:58 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-02 22:05 ` Nikolaus Rath
2015-11-03 8:39 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-31 19:24 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2015-10-31 20:13 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-31 21:08 ` Steinar Bang
2015-10-31 21:15 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-31 21:48 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-11-01 8:17 ` Steinar Bang
2015-11-01 8:54 ` David Kastrup
2015-11-01 10:17 ` Steinar Bang
2015-11-01 11:15 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-02 20:11 ` John Wiegley
2015-11-03 7:00 ` Oleh Krehel
2015-11-03 10:07 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-03 11:58 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 13:08 ` John Wiegley
2015-11-03 13:30 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 13:38 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-03 13:43 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 13:49 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-03 13:58 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 14:14 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-11-03 14:25 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 13:43 ` Oleh Krehel
2015-11-03 14:35 ` Óscar Fuentes
2015-11-03 14:52 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-11-03 15:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-03 16:04 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-11-03 18:14 ` Óscar Fuentes
2015-11-03 19:40 ` Jay Belanger
2015-11-03 20:15 ` John Wiegley
2015-11-03 20:24 ` Drew Adams
2015-11-03 20:35 ` Changing the tone of emacs-devel (Was: On the popularity of git) John Wiegley
2015-11-03 22:05 ` Artur Malabarba
2015-11-04 7:54 ` Nicolas Petton
2015-11-03 21:47 ` Changing the subject (was: " David Kastrup
2015-11-03 23:37 ` Marcin Borkowski
2015-11-04 0:27 ` John Yates
2015-11-04 1:40 ` Changing the subject Yann Hodique
2015-11-04 15:37 ` John Wiegley
2015-11-03 22:11 ` emacs-devel etiquette (was: Re: On the popularity of git) Stephen Leake
2015-11-04 11:12 ` Alan Mackenzie [this message]
2015-11-04 7:52 ` On the popularity of git Stephen J. Turnbull
2015-11-03 20:53 ` Richard Stallman
2015-11-03 13:49 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-10-30 12:50 ` On the popularity of git [Was: Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches?] Juanma Barranquero
2015-10-30 14:15 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-30 16:54 ` Juanma Barranquero
2015-10-30 17:31 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-29 16:31 ` Git question: when using branches, how does git treat working files when changing branches? Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-29 16:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-10-29 17:45 ` Davis Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151104111203.GB1736@acm.fritz.box \
--to=acm@muc.de \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.