From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
To: "Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer" <taylanbayirli@gmail.com>
Cc: Xue Fuqiao <xfq.free@gmail.com>,
Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>,
Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>,
bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: In support of guile-emacs
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:19:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151019171909.GH2438@acm.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87eggqn6eo.fsf@T420.taylan>
Hello, Taylan.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 06:56:47PM +0200, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
> > Hello, Daniel.
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:14:55AM -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> >> On 10/19/2015 03:24 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> >> > Hello, Xue.
> >> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 09:07:59AM +0800, Xue Fuqiao wrote:
> >> >> guile-emacs replaces Emacs's own Emacs Lisp engine with Guile's (without
> >> >> breaking backward compatibility). So:
> >> >> * Emacs Lisp will execute faster (Guile VM bytecode is more efficient)
> >> > Just as a matter of interest, approximately how much faster is Guile
> >> > bytecode than Emacs bytecode? Are we talking about 10%, 20%, 50%, a
> >> > factor of 2, or even higher?
> >> > If that speed increase was significant, it might be worth incorporating
> >> > Guile's bytecode into Emacs just for that reason, regardless of any of
> >> > the other stuff.
> >> Or simply making completely independent and custom-tailored improvements
> >> to the Emacs bytecode compiler and interpreter itself. There's no reason
> >> to imagine that the only way to improve performance there is to move to
> >> a completely different runtime.
> > Indeed not. Lessons could be learnt from Guile, perhaps. But how much
> > faster is Guile bytecode?
> For the record, the unreleased Guile 2.2 uses a register VM (instead of
> a stack VM), and has a different intermediate language on which more
> optimization is done. There's prospect for native code compilation too
> for the future, from what I gather. So Guile's performance isn't
> exactly fixed at its current state, and improvements are happening at a
> pretty impressive rate.
A true politician's (non-)answer. ;-)
Is the Guile VM, in fact, faster than the Emacs byte interpreter? Who's
done any measurements? Surely the speed advantage/disadvantage of the
Guile VM will depend, possibly a lot, on what program is being tested,
but has anybody actually done any actual benchmarking?
> Taylan
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-19 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-18 20:48 In support of guile-emacs Christopher Allan Webber
2015-10-18 23:12 ` Artur Malabarba
2015-10-19 1:07 ` Xue Fuqiao
2015-10-19 10:24 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-19 10:27 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-19 14:14 ` Daniel Colascione
2015-10-19 14:35 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-19 16:56 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
2015-10-19 17:19 ` Alan Mackenzie [this message]
2015-10-19 18:50 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
2015-10-19 19:03 ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-10-19 19:49 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
2015-10-19 20:12 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-19 21:01 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
2015-10-20 9:53 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-20 20:09 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
2015-10-20 23:46 ` John Wiegley
2015-10-21 12:54 ` Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer
2015-10-21 13:13 ` Alan Mackenzie
2015-10-20 6:00 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-19 14:50 ` David Kastrup
2015-10-19 8:22 ` Tom
2015-10-19 8:38 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-10-19 8:54 ` Tom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151019171909.GH2438@acm.fritz.box \
--to=acm@muc.de \
--cc=bruce.connor.am@gmail.com \
--cc=cwebber@dustycloud.org \
--cc=dancol@dancol.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=taylanbayirli@gmail.com \
--cc=xfq.free@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.