From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bob Proulx Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: sudo make install Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:31:15 -0600 Message-ID: <20150420112610279066192@bob.proulx.com> References: <87pp76wl1e.fsf@web.de> <20150415151457700363175@bob.proulx.com> <87r3rkbalh.fsf@web.de> <20150416143415154796888@bob.proulx.com> <87vbgu3iac.fsf@web.de> <20150418130152206309092@bob.proulx.com> <87twwc8cpl.fsf@web.de> <20150419173947526130678@bob.proulx.com> <87383uq23a.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429551091 27442 80.91.229.3 (20 Apr 2015 17:31:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 20 19:31:31 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YkFXe-0002g4-A1 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 19:31:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54746 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkFXd-0002me-NX for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:31:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52860) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkFXT-0002mX-Tu for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:31:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkFXQ-0005fM-LM for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:31:19 -0400 Original-Received: from joseki.proulx.com ([216.17.153.58]:48524) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkFXQ-0005fF-Eq for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:31:16 -0400 Original-Received: from hysteria.proulx.com (hysteria.proulx.com [192.168.230.119]) by joseki.proulx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD6021838; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:31:15 -0600 (MDT) Original-Received: by hysteria.proulx.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B66752DC41; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:31:15 -0600 (MDT) Mail-Followup-To: Michael Heerdegen , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87383uq23a.fsf@web.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 216.17.153.58 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:103888 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen wrote: > Would something like "umask g+r,g+x,o+r,o+x" work better in the > Makefile? This would avoid to make the umask more restictive in the 002 > case. Yes I would think so. Might as well combine those. I would probably want this behavior. umask u+rwx,go+rx,o-w If the user already has either 02 or 022 or 077 then it will preserve as much of that as practical. Bob