From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-24 d69e9f1: CC Mode: Stop Font Lock forcing fontification from BOL. Fixes debbugs#19669. Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 15:40:21 +0000 Message-ID: <20150207154021.GA3764@acm.acm> References: <20150201212213.17840.3710@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20150202213957.GF3673@acm.acm> <20150207122711.GA3772@acm.acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423323663 16257 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2015 15:41:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 15:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 07 16:41:03 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YK7VG-0002VW-3L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 16:41:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53519 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK7VF-0005op-G4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 10:41:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33657) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK7VC-0005oi-Ux for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 10:40:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK7V9-00014b-8X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 10:40:58 -0500 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:57216 helo=mail.muc.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YK7V8-00014S-VA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 10:40:55 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 1347 invoked by uid 3782); 7 Feb 2015 15:40:53 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (pD951A043.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.81.160.67]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 16:40:52 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 4119 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Feb 2015 15:40:21 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 8.x X-Received-From: 193.149.48.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:182614 Archived-At: Hello, Stefan. On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 10:29:54AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> What would be "the closest syntactically safe" position before 409? > > In the sense meant, 409 is the earliest "syntactically safe" position, > > since (char-before 409) is "{" > So, even point-min wouldn't be safe? No. It has to be somewhere within the enum's braces to work. > Stefan -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).