From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eric S. Raymond" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Testing the new VC code Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:52:04 -0500 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs Message-ID: <20141125025204.GA24848@thyrsus.com> References: <874mtp58a9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20141124083310.GA29913@thyrsus.com> <87zjbh3r98.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20141124094929.GA32148@thyrsus.com> <87k32k51ka.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20141124104616.GA1744@thyrsus.com> <87fvd8steg.fsf@gmx.de> <20141124130355.GA5432@thyrsus.com> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416883942 6312 80.91.229.3 (25 Nov 2014 02:52:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 02:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Yuri Khan Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 25 03:52:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xt6Ei-0000d6-P3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 03:52:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55254 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xt6Ei-0001p3-F2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:52:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58427) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xt6Eb-0001ot-Ee for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:52:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xt6EX-0001ou-3V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:52:09 -0500 Original-Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:39766 helo=snark.thyrsus.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xt6EX-0001oq-0O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:52:05 -0500 Original-Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B5100382BFD; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:52:04 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 71.162.243.5 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:178214 Archived-At: Yuri Khan : > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Steinar Bang wrote: > > > Instead of a patch, you could push the feature branch to an empty github > > repo if you don't wish to clutter up the emacs repo with feature > > branches. > > What about github being non-Free software-as-a-service? >:) I could use a similar technique with Gitorious. -- Eric S. Raymond