From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eric S. Raymond" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: My plans for VC mode Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:25:02 -0500 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs Message-ID: <20141123062502.GA8917@thyrsus.com> References: <20141122133351.46279382C23@snark.thyrsus.com> <86r3wvb900.fsf@yandex.ru> <20141122163707.GC25909@thyrsus.com> <5470CBEC.3000500@yandex.ru> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416723966 2680 80.91.229.3 (23 Nov 2014 06:26:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 06:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 23 07:25:56 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XsQcN-0006Ib-RA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 07:25:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47775 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsQcN-0004Dy-8J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:25:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43356) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsQc6-0004Dr-74 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:25:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsQc1-0008P4-VJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:25:38 -0500 Original-Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:40382 helo=snark.thyrsus.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsQc1-0008Ok-Ra for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:25:33 -0500 Original-Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 16B75382F38; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:25:03 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 71.162.243.5 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:178059 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier : > > The above list includes `state', which you're saying won't be changed > > much. > > He's saying vc-state won't be changed too much. That's different from > saying that the `state' backend operation won't be changed too much. Yes. I think the inentory of states it returns is reasonable. Though I will try to reduce it if I can find a way. -- Eric S. Raymond