From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Masatake YAMATO Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ctags/etags: rc file? Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:26:30 +0900 (JST) Organization: Red Hat Japan, Inc. Message-ID: <20141121.112630.2100980424764036065.yamato@redhat.com> References: <20141120.211912.1151762649217499427.yamato@redhat.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416536833 29516 80.91.229.3 (21 Nov 2014 02:27:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 02:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: ams@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 21 03:27:06 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XrdwA-00039K-An for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 03:27:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38193 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrdw9-0002SN-Ox for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 21:27:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56535) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrdvr-0002SF-R9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 21:26:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrdvl-0003KY-NQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 21:26:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42071) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrdvf-0003Ir-1c; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 21:26:35 -0500 Original-Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sAL2QXgY011590 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 20 Nov 2014 21:26:33 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (dhcp-193-84.nrt.redhat.com [10.64.193.84]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sAL2QVe5008161; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 21:26:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177904 Archived-At: > --options=file > Read additional options from file. The file should contain one > option per line. As a special case, if --options=NONE is spec‐ > ified as the first option on the command line, it will disable > the automatic reading of any configuration options from either > a file or the environment (see FILES). > > But ctags and etags, part of Emacs, do not have this functionality. I > do not know where this option comes from, but it is exactly what I > would like to see (minus the odd behaviour of --options=NONE, NONE is > a fully legal file name) in etags/ctags. I was talking about exuberant ctags(http://ctags.sourceforge.net/). I'm not sure about ctags which is part of Emacs. Masatake YAMATO