From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11386: C++11 support: C++ mode gets (temporarily) confused by edits to convert "> >" to ">>" in templates Date: 18 Nov 2014 21:15:19 -0000 Organization: muc.de e.V. Message-ID: <20141118211519.65986.qmail@mail.muc.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416345397 15996 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2014 21:16:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11386@debbugs.gnu.org To: R?diger Sonderfeld Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 18 22:16:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqq8S-0004In-CO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 22:16:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55413 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqq8R-0007eo-VN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:16:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqq8J-0007dr-P5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:16:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqq8E-0000Ui-Uf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:16:19 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40384) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqq82-0000Fq-UY; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:16:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqq82-00082H-JD; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:16:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11386 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11386-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11386.141634532430837 (code B ref 11386); Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11386) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2014 21:15:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37597 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqq7P-00081I-SP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:15:24 -0500 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:52940 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqq7M-000819-T2 for 11386@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:15:22 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 65987 invoked by uid 3782); 18 Nov 2014 21:15:19 -0000 In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug User-Agent: tin/2.2.0-20131224 ("Lochindaal") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/8.4-RELEASE (amd64)) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:96212 Guten Abend, Ruediger. In article you wrote: > tags 11386 fixed > Should be fixed in 66bb9533fc77963c495de7f33ec6dc8e4d342a55 OUTCH!!! Any chance you could be a little more informative with messages like this, please? The message as it stands suggests "I have just committed a fix as revision 66bb95...". The id 66bb95..., like all ids in git, carries no context, no age, no nothing. Better would have been to use the "present perfect" tense: "Should have been fixed in 66bb95...", which would have placed the action of fixing in the non-immediate past. Better still would have been to give details of the fix, something like "Should have been fixed in 66bb953... by Alan Mackenzie in August, title line "Make ">>" act as double template ender in C++ Mode."". Possibly the best thing of all would have been to construct an Eric Raymond style commit identifier, but I haven't got the syntax memorised yet. Any of these would have prevented me errupting in uncalled-for panic and fury. Thanks! -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).