From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eric S. Raymond" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: over-engineered (and under-standardized) inferior interfaces Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:10:38 -0400 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs Message-ID: <20140821221038.GA24021@thyrsus.com> References: <20140821232158.3d0aea56@forcix> <861ts9bj0c.fsf@yandex.ru> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1408659058 5527 80.91.229.3 (21 Aug 2014 22:10:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 22:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , Jorgen Schaefer To: Dmitry Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 22 00:10:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XKaZH-0001Cj-J9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:10:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34285 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKaZH-0006QB-0o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:10:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41929) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKaZB-0006Q2-8F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:10:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKaZ5-0003wD-5W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:10:44 -0400 Original-Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:52914 helo=snark.thyrsus.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKaZ4-0003w4-W3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 96861380471; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:10:38 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <861ts9bj0c.fsf@yandex.ru> X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 71.162.243.5 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173799 Archived-At: Dmitry : > Jorgen Schaefer writes: > > > Using a nice binding like C-c C-c for a somewhat less-common command > > like "compile the current file in the REPL" (as opposed to using M-x > > (re)compile) seems like a waste. > > > > So I'd suggest using C-c C-c for a new prog-proc-send-region-or-buffer. > > +1 I used C-c C-c as a commit binding in VC-mode. This seems consistent. -- Eric S. Raymond