From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eric S. Raymond" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Converted git repository available for review Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:50:11 -0400 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs Message-ID: <20140325115011.GA3314@thyrsus.com> References: <20140322092001.GB31376@thyrsus.com> <20140322110331.GA32641@thyrsus.com> <20140324223928.GA29763@thyrsus.com> <87fvm6ww0u.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20140325105436.GA468@thyrsus.com> <87r45qv8rt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20140325113252.GA783@thyrsus.com> <87mwgev75s.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395748252 31290 80.91.229.3 (25 Mar 2014 11:50:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 25 12:51:02 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WSPsi-00036D-MF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 12:51:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41120 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSPsg-00011f-9V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:50:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36031) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSPsZ-0000sZ-9J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:50:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSPsV-0007ns-38 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:50:51 -0400 Original-Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:52638 helo=snark.thyrsus.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WSPsQ-0007mX-Ex; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:50:42 -0400 Original-Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D771238099B; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:50:11 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mwgev75s.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 71.162.243.5 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170960 Archived-At: David Kastrup : > > The review1 repo has only had one push. > > If the sole difference before the next push is a git gc --aggressive, it > still won't have a reason to fetch anything. > > If you did a whole history rewrite invalidating all previous references, > things will be different. Though then there is not all that much > incentive to using the same repository. That's likely to be nearly the case, since I'm going to tryt a different set of transformations for ignore files after Paul Eggert's feedback. -- Eric S. Raymond