From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eric S. Raymond" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should 'old-branches' and 'other-branches' be kept? Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:30:58 -0500 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs Message-ID: <20140212143058.GA30616@thyrsus.com> References: <20140211203302.67959380834@snark.thyrsus.com> <20140212032344.GA20023@thyrsus.com> Reply-To: esr@thyrsus.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392215465 7547 80.91.229.3 (12 Feb 2014 14:31:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 12 15:31:14 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WDaqE-0008Ie-26 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:31:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39393 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDaqD-0004MZ-Mm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:31:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56046) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDaq7-0004Ic-FI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:31:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDaq3-0003sR-85 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:31:03 -0500 Original-Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:44546 helo=snark.thyrsus.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDaq3-0003sJ-4f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:30:59 -0500 Original-Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7A04A3807CD; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:30:58 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 71.162.243.5 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169557 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier : > I don't understand why those branches make any difference, unless you're > trying to do your analysis also on those branches, which is > not worthwhile. I'm trying to fix up the attic filenames everywhere. They occur on the old branches as well as on the > Just preserve their info "as-is". The only important > part is that if someone wants to look at them he doesn't need to go back > to Bzr. OK, I believe I've worked out a way to do that. -- Eric S. Raymond