From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: esr@thyrsus.com (Eric S. Raymond) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Should 'old-branches' and 'other-branches' be kept? Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:33:02 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20140211203302.67959380834@snark.thyrsus.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392150793 7051 80.91.229.3 (11 Feb 2014 20:33:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:33:13 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 11 21:33:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WDK18-0002Go-B5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:33:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35854 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDK17-0001dz-8N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:33:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51860) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDK0z-0001dU-O5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:33:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDK0t-00024A-M4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:33:09 -0500 Original-Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:37731 helo=snark.thyrsus.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDK0t-00023O-Ip for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:33:03 -0500 Original-Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 67959380834; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:33:02 -0500 (EST) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 71.162.243.5 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169532 Archived-At: I'm looking at the old0branches and other-branches remote groups. It seems pretty clear that most of these were either marged to trunk or abandoned during the CVS period. Are any of them worth keeping around? old-branches/EMACS_21_1_RC old-branches/EMACS_22_BASE old-branches/EMACS_23_1_RC old-branches/NewVC-fileset old-branches/branch-5_8 old-branches/cedet-branch old-branches/elpa old-branches/emacs-unicode old-branches/emacs-unicode-2 old-branches/font-backend old-branches/gerd_defvaralias old-branches/gnus-5_10-branch old-branches/imagemagick old-branches/lexbind old-branches/lexbind-new old-branches/multi-tty old-branches/pending old-branches/profiler old-branches/python old-branches/rmail-mbox-branch old-branches/unicode-xft old-branches/window-pub other-branches/Boehm-GC other-branches/Boehm-versions other-branches/DAVELOVE other-branches/FLYSPELL other-branches/ILYA other-branches/URL other-branches/VENDOR other-branches/XFT_JHD_BRANCH other-branches/custom_themes other-branches/fx-branch other-branches/gerd_0001 other-branches/gerd_big other-branches/gerd_dbe other-branches/gerd_int other-branches/glibc-2_0_x other-branches/master-UNNAMED-BRANCH other-branches/miles-orphaned-changes other-branches/old-bidi other-branches/old-concurrency other-branches/patches_21_0 other-branches/test2 other-branches/thomas-posix1996 other-branches/ttn-vms-21-2-stash other-branches/ttn-vms-21-3-stash -- >>esr>>