From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jorgen Schaefer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is intellisense features integration in Emacs technically possible? Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:34:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20140123203400.20f1536d@forcix.kollektiv-hamburg.de> References: <1390269670.2888.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <83zjmpf80o.fsf@gnu.org> <877g9shqms.fsf@newcastle.ac.uk> <20140122194930.49ba60be@forcix.kollektiv-hamburg.de> <52E0DA45.2030600@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390505661 7075 80.91.229.3 (23 Jan 2014 19:34:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?B?UvZobGVy?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 23 20:34:28 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W6Q2i-0004pC-CR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:34:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42894 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6Q2h-0000RE-TC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:34:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46447) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6Q2X-0000J5-F2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:34:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6Q2R-00049X-AS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:34:13 -0500 Original-Received: from loki.jorgenschaefer.de ([87.230.15.51]:50075) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W6Q2R-00049K-3t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:34:07 -0500 Original-Received: by loki.jorgenschaefer.de (Postfix, from userid 998) id EF1F8201369; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:34:04 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from forcix.kollektiv-hamburg.de (x2f0f3d1.dyn.telefonica.de [2.240.243.209]) by loki.jorgenschaefer.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BBAA201367; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:34:02 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <52E0DA45.2030600@online.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 87.230.15.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168979 Archived-At: On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:00:53 +0100 Andreas R=F6hler wrote: > An aspect not seeing mentioned so far: Python for example will cancel > all service when encountering a syntax-error. A case where a decent > support from Emacs Lips side will be helpful. Seems wise to implement > some basic stuff in Emacs Lisp, while accessing the languages > resources if available. I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Both Rope as well as Jedi (the two Python libraries for completion and code introspection I mentioned) handle syntactically incorrect input quite fine, without any special treatment from the Emacs side. What do you mean with "will cancel all service"? Regards, Jorgen