From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Default behaviour of RET. Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 19:26:42 +0000 Message-ID: <20131016192642.GD3125@acm.acm> References: <20131013101325.GA2621@acm.acm> <20131013140931.GC2621@acm.acm> <20131013172841.GA2498@acm.acm> <525D8946.4070406@gmx.at> <20131016171240.GA3125@acm.acm> <525EDC50.8010401@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1381951733 16373 80.91.229.3 (16 Oct 2013 19:28:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 19:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 16 21:28:55 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VWWm7-00036z-I7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 21:28:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49073 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VWWm7-0006wF-1x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:28:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VWWlx-0006uL-W3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:28:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VWWlq-0005KS-N1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:28:45 -0400 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:31809 helo=mail.muc.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VWWlq-0005KG-DA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:28:38 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 67332 invoked by uid 3782); 16 Oct 2013 19:28:36 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (pD951A2A4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.81.162.164]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 21:28:35 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 3873 invoked by uid 1000); 16 Oct 2013 19:26:42 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <525EDC50.8010401@gmx.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 8.x X-Received-From: 193.149.48.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164250 Archived-At: Hi, Martin. On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:34:56PM +0200, martin rudalics wrote: > > For what you want, `newline-and-indent' exists, as you know. > I've been talking about the command run by RET and that I'm lost when I > run emacs -Q and try to do some editing. Otherwise, I don't care about > the standard behavior because I obviously have RET run my own command. > But if I were new to Emacs, I certainly would want RET to indent the new > line out of the box. I might agree with you, at least for programming modes. I'm not so sure about things like Text Mode. But there must also be a ready way of doing what RET currently does, inserting a new line without indenting it. > martin -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).