From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Skilbeck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Does anyone really use emacs in terminal? Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 20:52:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20130505195051.GA9452@moon> References: <87mws9v6x4.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1367783539 23946 80.91.229.3 (5 May 2013 19:52:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 19:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" , "help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" To: Steven Degutis Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 05 21:52:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UZ4yo-0002Gx-7Y for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 21:52:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45368 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZ4yn-0000jB-Pe for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 15:52:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53661) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZ4yc-0000ih-2Y for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 15:52:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZ4yb-0007ti-3r for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 15:52:06 -0400 Original-Received: from li357-97.members.linode.com ([178.79.188.97]:54796 helo=mail.iammark.us) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZ4ya-0007sg-U2 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 05 May 2013 15:52:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.iammark.us (host86-156-209-87.range86-156.btcentralplus.com [86.156.209.87]) by mail.iammark.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E453CAF12; Sun, 5 May 2013 20:52:02 +0100 (BST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 178.79.188.97 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:90522 Archived-At: On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 02:31:24PM -0500, Steven Degutis wrote: > By "normal", I mean how scrollbars work in the vast majority of > desktop GUIs since 1995. > > On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Pascal J. Bourguignon > wrote: > > Stefan Monnier writes: > > > >>> Why don't the scrollbars work like normal? > >> > >> Probably because the difference is *much* smaller than the amount of > >> effort needed to mimick the "normal". > > > > And in any case, what "normal" the usual "normal", or the new "normal" > > of MacOSX Mountain Lion or iOS? > > > > -- > > __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ > > A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}. Which is how? -mgsk