From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13965: info.info conflict between emacs and texinfo Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:25:14 GMT Message-ID: <201304022125.r32LPEU4015513__8973.15135594017$1364937995$gmane$org@freefriends.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364937967 20036 80.91.229.3 (2 Apr 2013 21:26:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13965@debbugs.gnu.org, bug-texinfo@gnu.org To: rgm@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 02 23:26:34 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UN8iw-0001aB-BC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 23:26:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35585 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN8iX-00087y-Kn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59309) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN8iR-00084u-15 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN8iQ-0000Y1-2o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UN8iP-0000Xw-Vl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UN8lJ-0006qR-Uh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13965 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13965-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13965.136493810026255 (code B ref 13965); Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13965) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2013 21:28:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58718 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UN8kd-0006pQ-JE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:28:20 -0400 Original-Received: from frenzy.freefriends.org ([66.54.153.139]:37472 helo=freefriends.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UN8ka-0006pG-9j for 13965@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:28:17 -0400 X-Envelope-From: karl@freefriends.org Original-Received: from freefriends.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefriends.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r32LPEWv015515; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:25:15 -0600 Original-Received: (from nobody@localhost) by freefriends.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/submit) id r32LPEU4015513; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:25:14 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: frenzy.freefriends.org: nobody set sender to karl@freefriends.org using -f In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:73096 Archived-At: If it really helps you, we could rename it. Well, obviously it is not a stopper. I can edit the file when I import it and ignore that difference. We'll have to change 58 files, several of which also live in other repositories. The point is that nearly every other package in GNU uses fdl.texi (as far as I have seen). Why should Emacs use a different name for the file? It just seems wrong. It won't make any difference to this issue (I assume), Indeed. k