From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xue Fuqiao Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 16:33:10 +0800 Message-ID: <20130401163310.1197329305d5085fed41c910@gmail.com> References: <87ehf1cwc4.fsf@maru.md5i.com> <20130331220136.GA16863@saturn> <20130401070006.1b17508d3c3c69b69ac22bc7@gmail.com> <20130331234002.GC16863@saturn> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364805200 12645 80.91.229.3 (1 Apr 2013 08:33:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 08:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Welsh Duggan , Leo Liu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Giorgos Keramidas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 01 10:33:47 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UMaBV-0000RS-76 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:33:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34473 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UMaB6-0000BE-Ng for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 04:33:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35769) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UMaB1-0000A5-1i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 04:33:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UMaAv-0006cK-04 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 04:33:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:54483) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UMaAu-0006c9-QJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 04:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id kp14so1196386pab.8 for ; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 01:33:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=W9dxd5BMN96XgesqiRGnnYRT46VMmFuVbrp32LPVm/c=; b=UL9GLeurY6HwcbTQUExt8JhpTsyuaS0vjuD4hag/dItG0MJ6RxD+/G7xcqOqaQIxq3 Qu3H6DKgwumy3M8cmLJR+N6AVgE8mxRkNFszUsXR06UCt565IAkitdLYd2n2axfpBb9n 3bPFAZVn7n1msM2X7BdptJfFFiEiO2A0QX4NUNFMHn8WPOcO5piXDh99Hnh76V5zE/qw NhBvGlFfTBe0KIul4wCqPY5wLP15KZhQEbQ0u/E8aj0DVF2/ZQ6KNnsr1D8SXuvws/mK jRYieVYNxkOafAdkvRCT9GufAA0/2RBm2QcIIphNSKuCxWA/driyfZO9+YVXB2jfbh2d J0VQ== X-Received: by 10.66.170.44 with SMTP id aj12mr17451243pac.31.1364805188154; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 01:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from debian.emacs ([123.114.131.74]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qh4sm14437837pac.8.2013.04.01.01.33.04 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Apr 2013 01:33:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130331234002.GC16863@saturn> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.220.49 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158509 Archived-At: On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 01:40:03 +0200 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > The real argument I was trying to make is 'the fact that project X uses > bzr/hg/git today doesn't really constitute a very strong argument for > the longevity of said VCS'. Right, that's also what I was trying to express. (I deliberately put Emacs into the list.) -- Xue Fuqiao http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/