Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 109, Issue 57

["d.henman" <dhenman@gmail.com>]

Mr. Stallman's statement was factual and accurately described the messages' function. It was by no means an attack on ones character, or lack thereof.  That has already been made known, by yourself.   I must admit that your messages, being melodramatic a
nd the use of silly phraseology is kind of funny, but, alas, it doesn't belong on this list.  I invite you to withdraw your pleasure in this developement forum.

Cheers,

emacs-devel-request@gnu.org wrote:
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
> 
> You dismissed the content of what I wrote, citing not the content, but
> an attribution of intent to me.  That is, without doubt, argumentum ad
> hominem.
> 
> Your attribution was also false.  I am genuinely concerned that the
> FSF and I disagree over the scope of my assignments.  I don't know if
> it matters enough to me to do something about it -- I'll have to think
> about that -- but I was shocked by the breadth of the claim that you
> seemed to be making.
b