From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Xue Fuqiao Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Loading souce Elisp faster Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:44:51 +0800 Organization: The Church of Emacs Message-ID: <20130226184451.f487aae94559a3f0fcc45858@gmail.com> References: <877glwtt5i.fsf@gnu.org> <20130225215038.ab62ebb7b21a755178fb2848@gmail.com> <8338wkjsq5.fsf@gnu.org> <20130226063904.8797a8951015b281429f05eb@gmail.com> <83ip5fivly.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361877873 11375 80.91.229.3 (26 Feb 2013 11:24:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: handa@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 26 12:24:55 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UAIeT-0001Ks-GV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:24:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49635 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAIe8-0005C5-Mt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 06:24:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47207) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAIe5-0005Ay-L8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 06:24:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAI3h-0005Gp-Ut for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 05:46:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41]:64487) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAI27-0004ld-F9; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 05:45:15 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id fb11so2389663pad.28 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:45:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:organization:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PxXweyvfwXPe0dOXWZTGD99mL+2Q4fdZbxCTK8XgILQ=; b=zsEASd9NAqw2DUN76jClWEU5gNqhG4NRNfkYikqwx1dQIs1cNCtk7c2X9/SZeGEfM+ kIc4Ql0c05JU8+EzT7V3hribB4cA77Zgg1AwueLnI8c8RMZrQiITgV0P3sGhDSwlmTlY Rc5oeidDqqU1uy8WOQaAOWzWmfp01AXxa3KqwNvxtGXIzyYT7un//OF+GzqveYON53ZW LBrKW4DoNPFdhwU/e5SHnvzz1HL1bPzXmUGTR0DLxS6t5VJwpVI2fQWNXYFxGVcRtPO7 xdvE1b4FZK/jR5m2iBkhWyNqAJ7/pX920S1RsNqXHMKe3iHKunMVeB3tnmeC6pK/Xhwn Q5IA== X-Received: by 10.66.162.232 with SMTP id yd8mr1091330pab.100.1361875513922; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:45:13 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Emacs ([123.114.129.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id zw3sm536276pbc.23.2013.02.26.02.45.04 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:45:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83ip5fivly.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.220.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157384 Archived-At: On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 05:48:09 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > utf-8-emacs and utf-8 are not the same encoding. The former is a > > > variant used by Emacs internally, it won't be 100% recognizable by any > > > program except Emacs. > > Why `utf-8-emacs'? Why not `utf-8-auto' or `utf-8'? > Are you asking my why it was named that way? Because it's specific to > Emacs, I guess. I didn't mean that, sorry. I mean why `utf-8-emacs'(i.e., `emacs-internal') is recommended in "(elisp) Coding Conventions". -- Best regards, Xue Fuqiao. http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/XueFuqiao